Make research about British Museums cultural and artistic activities that are organised in the last 2 years and for a specific period (such as temporary exhibitions, seminars, symposiums, movie screens, music concerts, art courses or workshops and etc.-except educational programs)
Cultural and artistic activities can be organised either online or in the museum premises
Evaluate cultural and artistic activities in terms of museums communication function
Please answer the following question:
Having taking this course, do you think the scaleups are more interesting places to work than startups and large corporations?
Please agree on this idea, look for reasons why scaleups are more interesting and explain it without adding sources. This should be done as personal opinion and it might be a thought analyzed “after” the course that we have covered.
Do it as if you were “answering an email”.
No additional resources should be included. Just personal opinion using words such as “I consider”, “I believe”, “In my opinion”
Answer the following question:
HOW DO YOU THINK COVID-19 WILL AFFECT SCALEUPS? WHICH OF THE INDUSTRIES THAT WE HAVE DISCUSSED IN THE SESSION WILL BE THE MOST AFFECTED?
Please support the reasons why covid-19 will affect scaleups. Regarding the industries,
The industries can be: artificial intelligence, automotive, augmented and virtual reeality, bitcoin and blockchain, cybersecurity, financial services. Choose ONE of this industries and explain why is it going to be the most affected industry.
There should NOT be additional resources. You can do research and base it in your words.
Please develop this task as if you were “answering an email”. No resources, just answer explaining why you think covid will affect scaleups (based on research) and which one is going to be the most affected industry.
Please answer the following question:
Having taking this course, do you think the scaleups are more interesting places to work than startups and large corporations?
Please agree on this idea, look for reasons why scaleups are more interesting and explain it without adding sources. This should be done as personal opinion and it might be a thought analyzed “after” the course that we have covered.
Do it as if you were “answering an email”.
Write an essay (with introduction and conclusion) on the suggested topic.
Your introduction should include the thesis statement – main idea of the paper (here is more detailed explanation – https://essayshark.com/blog/how-to-write-a-thesis-statement-to-make-it-clear/). Don’t include any new information in the conclusion. It should restate the thesis statement of the paper.
Support your ideas with relevant arguments and examples (in-text citations). List 2-3 sources in the references. Make sure you stick to a required formatting style. Get benefits of these sources citationmachine.net and easybib.com.
MLA format – https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html
Write an essay (with introduction and conclusion) on the suggested topic.
Your introduction should include the thesis statement – main idea of the paper (here is more detailed explanation – https://essayshark.com/blog/how-to-write-a-thesis-statement-to-make-it-clear/). Don’t include any new information in the conclusion. It should restate the thesis statement of the paper.
Support your ideas with relevant arguments and examples (in-text citations). List 2-3 sources in the references. Make sure you stick to a required formatting style. Get benefits of these sources citationmachine.net and easybib.com.
MLA format – https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_in_text_citations_the_basics.html
Background: Economists are increasingly required to work in interdisciplinary teams and engage with members of the general public to express their research findings.
In this assessment, your task is to educate a non-specialist audience about an issue of your choice pertaining to pricing data and the Australian petrol market.
You will translate your advanced academic knowledge of the economics of petrol pricing into an engaging and educating article that a member of the general public can understand and enjoy. This article could be a magazine article, longform newspaper op-ed, piece for The Economist, or similar. You can assume your audience cares about how much they’re paying when they fill up their tank, but you can’t assume they know how the economy works or the theories that an economist would use to analyse it.
Assignment task: Write an article for a popular publication to educate a non-specialist audience about an issue, debate, or future prediction pertaining to petrol pricing in the Australian market.
Although a publication like a tabloid newspaper may not include sources in real life, your submission still needs to. At least 7 academic sources are required, and should be referenced properly using a recognised academic style guide such as CMS or APA. You may also employ your quantitative results from experiments conducted in this unit if relevant.
A strong submission will take a clear stance and/or pose a clear argument related to some aspect of pricing data and the Australian petrol market.
Your article should use language appropriate to a non-specialist audience, and include thoughtful rhetorical choices designed to engage and educate them.
Please specify who your intended audience are, including a brief indication of their interests and assumed knowledge. Please also note the publication you are writing for, and anything you would like to specify about style. For example, I am writing for people who want to know why supermarkets now own petrol stations, and whether this gets in the way of a fair price. I am writing for The Daily Telegraph using an accessible tone so that people can quickly absorb my message on a daily commute or similar. This information should be placed before the heading of your main text to avoid confusion.
Please mention that:
1. Please read Lecture1 and lectures(PPT FILES) clearfully!!!!!
2.please use the information I post called Sydney RC1
Background: Economists are increasingly required to work in interdisciplinary teams and engage with members of the general public to express their research findings.
In this assessment, your task is to educate a non-specialist audience about an issue of your choice pertaining to pricing data and the Australian petrol market.
You will translate your advanced academic knowledge of the economics of petrol pricing into an engaging and educating article that a member of the general public can understand and enjoy. This article could be a magazine article, longform newspaper op-ed, piece for The Economist, or similar. You can assume your audience cares about how much they’re paying when they fill up their tank, but you can’t assume they know how the economy works or the theories that an economist would use to analyse it.
Assignment task: Write an article for a popular publication to educate a non-specialist audience about an issue, debate, or future prediction pertaining to petrol pricing in the Australian market.
Although a publication like a tabloid newspaper may not include sources in real life, your submission still needs to. At least 7 academic sources are required, and should be referenced properly using a recognised academic style guide such as CMS or APA. You may also employ your quantitative results from experiments conducted in this unit if relevant.
A strong submission will take a clear stance and/or pose a clear argument related to some aspect of pricing data and the Australian petrol market.
Your article should use language appropriate to a non-specialist audience, and include thoughtful rhetorical choices designed to engage and educate them.
Please specify who your intended audience are, including a brief indication of their interests and assumed knowledge. Please also note the publication you are writing for, and anything you would like to specify about style. For example, I am writing for people who want to know why supermarkets now own petrol stations, and whether this gets in the way of a fair price. I am writing for The Daily Telegraph using an accessible tone so that people can quickly absorb my message on a daily commute or similar. This information should be placed before the heading of your main text to avoid confusion.
Please mention that:
1. Please read Lecture1 and lectures(PPT FILES) clearfully!!!!!
2.please use the information I post called Sydney Retail Petrol Price Cycles
ou must rely on key authors, provide quotes, notions
PLEASE WRITE CLEAR HYPOTHESIS
Formal requirements:
4 pages,
12 spt, times new Roman,
paragraph 1,15-1,5, standard margins, single-spaced,
no title page (just surname in the first line,
no plagiarism (use quotes with references, references if you paraphrase etc, references must be mentioned exactly where you cite -not at the end of a big paragraph etc)
Recommended structure:
Brief intro (few phrases)
Your key idea (presumably-answer for the major question
Argumentation
Conclusion (is you idea correct or not)
References.
I would like do have a specific and detailed research plan for my dissertation’s literature review and framework (either conceptual or theoretical).
I have attached some information on my dissertation. Please refer to it as there are also quick research notes previously made on the topic. We are required to write 10 000 words total, however I don’t really mind how many words are written for the plan as long as it is detailed.
I would like to have the plan for my literature review and framework. I should write”
Lit review: around 2500 words
Framework: around 750 words
So please make sure the plan takes into account the amount of info I will be able to write about.
I have also attached an example of structure for these two parts (for a different topic). The ideal would be to receive something similar to that plan structure document, but with added details such as the specifics of the framework and the theories and papers to refer to for example (whatever seems right to you).
