Research on sexuality is particularly muddy because researchers cannot agree on definitions for describing hetro and homosexuality. This means every time you pick up an article on sexuality you will need to first determine what the researcher’s definition is before you can appreciate what conclusions are offered.

Many scientific disciplines offer strict definitions for describing, characterizing, and defining things: For example in anatomy an organ is defined as a group of tissues working together; In psychology the Diagnostic Statistical Manual provides a detailed description for every documented mental illness.

Take a stance:

Should the definitions for heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and bi-homosexual be standardized in the field of sexuality research? Can the definitions be standardized? What would your version look like?

Or

Should definitions be variable depending on the nature of the  research; keep in mind this may mean  excluding subjects (that do not fit a given definition), or altering definitions to suit a particular study? Give examples and provide any insight that you can. Why can’t sexuality be standardized to black and white terms?

Complete the reading assessment following the template and citing with supporting quotes/mentions from the book. There are additional sources below or feel free to locate other sources with information on the book Sick Kids in Love by Hannah Moskowitz.

I AM UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE BOOK BUT THE E-BOOK CAN BE ACCESSED VIA PUBLIC LIBRARY ACCOUNT ON https://www.hoopladigital.com.

Example attached. PP are for background/reference.

Specific questions for each of the 5 criteria sections can be found on this website: http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~dea22/multicultural.html

Note: Purpose isn’t the purpose of the work but whether the culture had a purpose in the text.

Assignment:

The goal of the short response pieces is to give you the chance to engage more deeply with an idea from the reading, either in a positive way by applying that idea to a practical context or in a negative way by challenging that idea.  Thus, these will be graded purely on your engagement with the material.

In general, a short response piece should:

Take an idea from one of the readings assigned that day and explain how it expands or challenges a traditional approach to a policy problem. How would this idea change your practice as a policy leader?  How would implementing this idea change your analysis of a public problem?
Challenge an idea from the reading with an alternative principle or a counterexample. What is the author missing, and why would that idea change the application of the idea to practical policy problems?

Competency
Describe the need for compassion in healthcare.

Scenario
An essential element of the Death with Dignity Act ensures that you educate patients and their family members regarding the process and provide them with their options. Rassy Medical Center offers Death with Dignity as a service to their patients. As the physician at the clinic, it is imperative that you follow the proper protocol and process to enact Death with Dignity for all of your patients that request it.

Instructions
Create a questionnaire that lists 15 interview questions you would ask your patients or their family members regarding Death with Dignity and end of life/palliative care for the patient. Ask your questions to a friend or family member, and document their answers in a Word document in question/answer format.

Be sure to include this question: Do you agree with the Death with Dignity Act, why or why not?

Rubric
15 questions provided. Answers are provided for all questions.
Questions are respectful and show a clear understanding of ethical and moral concerns regarding end-of-life care and Death with Dignity.
Questions focus on multiple aspects of end of life care and indicate a very clear understanding of Death with Dignity issues.

This week, you were provided with an in-depth examination of the insanity defense. Throughout your reading, you learned what is involved in determining if a defendant is NGRI or GBMI as well as the evolution of an insanity defense. Now, you will demonstrate your understanding of this topic by writing a paper that evaluates the insanity defense. Be sure your paper addresses the following:

    Explore the legal definition of insanity and psychologys role in this definition.

    Discuss how frequently the insanity defense is used and how successful it is.

    Explain common beliefs about the insanity defense and their accuracy.

    Discuss some of the concerns or major criticisms about the insanity defense and the legitimacy to those concerns.

    Summarize any proposed reforms.

Support your assignment with at least two references from scholarly resources.

Length: 2-3 pages

The image will appear as a box graph where the boxes are different sizes based upon how much that item was traded (in %).
You can toggle between exports and imports using the options on the page and hover over the boxes in the graph for more information on each product category. 

https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/explore?country=231&product=undefined&year=1996&tradeDirection=import&productClass=HS&target=Product&partner=undefined&startYear=undefined

Based upon the data of your country from Atlas and your observations, your initial post should address the following questions:

1.What changes have you noticed in the exports of the United States?

2.What changes have you noticed in the imports of the United States?

3.What would you surmise are the trade advantages of the United States (please use course theory to support your answer)? https://www.brainscape.com/flashcards/chapter-6-theories-of-international-trade-6403443/packs/10055457

4.What would you say the United States has a comparative advantage in?

5.If you were going to engage in International Business in this country, what implications would your answer to question 4 mean for your business?

FIRST, do some freewriting; reflecting on your chosen text, write without stopping to correct or read your writing. Write down any ideas that come into your head about the text. Dont worry if they are dumb or smartall ideas in a freewrite are good ideas. You can mine the sentences for gold later! As you write, consider these ideas to get you going:

How does the text make you feel?
Do you agree with it? Why or why not?
Does it successfully convey its message? Why or why not?
What does the text want you to do after reading it?
Does it make you want to do that? Why or why not?
What details are most powerful?
Which details are least convincing / powerful?

NEXT, create an outline for your paper using the chart below and the work youre doing in your thesis workshop this week. Remember that a good thesis offers an outline of the major points youll make in your paper. The outline you do here will expand further on those major points and put them in a logical order. Remember also that an analysis is more than a summary; your topic/discussion points should not simply sum up various elements of the text; they should break down those elements to examine how they work on readers/viewers. These sections should be written in full, clear sentences.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ytn3v2DqIU (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Watch Elizabeth Loftus: The Fiction of Memory.  It is a TED talk.  Watch the entire video. I suggest taking notes as you watch because there is a LOT of stuff in there you can react to NOT just the opening story.  If you only talk about the opening story in the video, you will only receive half credit at most.

Length: At least 1 full page

These papers are to be REACTION papers not book reports.  I have watched this video; I want to know your thoughts and reactions to it.  You must refer to parts of what you read so I know what you are reacting to, but it is to be a majority of your thoughts and words not simply reporting what you read — I think, I agree, I disagree, etc.

Topic-DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

Students are asked to select a current (since January, 2020) article from the newspaper, magazine, or the Internet that relates to your topic.     

For this report students will: (a) include a copy of an article that relates to your topic,  (b) analyze the article by showing how two different theorists Durkheim and Mead could be used to explain the same article.  How would Durkheim analyze the article?  Identify and discuss two different approaches.  How would Mead analyze the article?  Identify and discuss two different approaches.  Papers must be double spaced and at least 2 pages in length.                                 
   

MUST USE ARTICLE BELOW:

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/in-depth/domestic-violence/art-20048397

Personal statements are often required when you apply to academic institutions, health career programs, scholarships and other awards.

You will write a personal statement which answers the following questions:

Why do you want to become a/an _________________? (Fill in the blank with your top career choice.)
How will you meet the challenges of a/an______________  program.? (Fill in the blank with the academic program required for your career).
What will you contribute to the field of ____________ after you complete your education?  (Fill in the blank with your top career choice).
You may discuss the following:

Your educational backgroundknowledge or experience gained
Your previous/current work experience (if any)accolades given or challenges overcome
Specific or unique attributes you could bring to the career
Your personal and professional goals
Your commitment to diversity, social justice, and being a local and global citizen
Anything else which makes you stand out from other applicants