To develop these four sub-topics:

Consult a general encyclopedia and a specialized encyclopedia for your research (this week’s Learning Materials covers the difference between the two). Do not look for books or articles at this point. Just use encyclopedias. 
You must have at least two encyclopedias for each of your four sub-topics, and only one can be a general encyclopedia. You can use the same general encyclopedia for all four sub-topics.

Write the following as a document for each sub-topic:
Your broad subject area
Your sub-topic
A description of the sub-topic (no more than a paragraph)
Which encyclopedias you used
Create a search vocabulary of that sub-topic.  A search vocabulary is a list of terms and phrases appropriate to your sub-topic that would be useful for searching databases and catalogs.
Pay attention to the terminology used in the encyclopedias to develop your search vocabulary.
You must have at least five but no more than ten terms or phrases for your sub- topic.

A valuable website to review the screening prevention recommendations based on the latest evidence based practice :

https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/home

On your discussion this week answer the following questions:

1.) What is the U.S. Preventive Task Force (USPTF)?

2. ) Select a disease for example colon cancer and discuss the screening age recommendations and the screening tools recommended for early prevention?

Major Assignment 1: Developing a Research Topic for a Qualitative Study
For this week, you will submit Parts 1, 2, and the Annotated Bibliography of your Major Assignment 1 to your Instructor to receive feedback.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Finalize your Parts 1, 2, and the Annotated Bibliography of your Major Assignment 1.
By Day 7
Submit Parts 1, 2, and your Annotated Bibliography section of your Major Assignment 1.

Note: Once you receive your Instructors feedback, you will incorporate their feedback and re-submit in Week 8 when you complete Part 3 of this Major Assignment 1.

Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension) as the name.
Click the Major Assignment 1 First Draft Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 4 Major Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to View Rubric for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension) and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Major Assignment 1 First Draft Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Major Assignment 1 draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Major Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

Case Study

Chief complaint: Im here for a medication refill because I ran out of my medicines.

HPI:  Mrs. Allen is a 68-year-old African American who presents to the clinic for prescription refills. The patient indicates that she has noticed shortness of breath which started about 3 months ago. The SOB gets worse with exertion, especially when she is walking fast, and it is resolved when she is resting. She reports that she is also bothered by shortness of breath that wakes her up intermittently during her sleep. Her symptoms of shortness of breath resolve after sitting upright on 3 pillows. She also has lower leg edema pitting 1+ which started 2 weeks ago. She indicates that she often feels light headed at times with intermittent syncope episodes while going up a flight of stairs, but it resolves after sitting down to rest. She has not tried any over the counter medications at home.

She started taking her medications, but failed to refill the prescriptions because she cannot afford the medications as she only works part-time and lives alone. In addition, she reports that she does not think taking all these medications would help her condition anyway.

PMH: Primary Hypertension, Previous history of MI 1 year ago

Surgeries:

1 year ago-Left Anterior Descending (LAD) cardiac stent placement

Allergies: Penicillin

Vaccination History:  Up-to-date

Social history:

High school graduate married and no children. Drinks one 4-ounce glass of red wine daily. She is a former smoker and stopped 5 years ago.

Family history:

Both parents are alive. Father has history of MI and valvular heart disease; mother alive and cardiac history is unknown. He has one brother who is alive and has history of MI 5 years ago at age 52.

ROS:

Constitutional: Lightheaded and faint with exertion. Respiratory: Shortness of breath with exertion. + Orthopnea. Cardiovascular: + 2 pitting leg edema for 3 weeks.

Psychiatric: Non-contributory.

Physical examination:

Vital Signs: Height: 5 feet 1 inches Weight: 175 pounds BMI: 32, Obese, BP 160/92, T 98.0, P 111,  R 22 and non-labored

HEENT: Normocephalic/Atraumatic, Bilateral cataracts; PERRLA, EOMI; Teeth intact. Negative for gum disease. NECK: Neck supple, no palpable masses, no lymphadenopathy, no thyroid enlargement. LUNGS: + Mild Crackles on inspiratory phase not clearing with cough. Equal breath sounds. Symmetrical respiration. No respiratory distress. HEART: Normal S1 with S2 during expiration. An S4 is noted at the apex; + systolic murmur noted at the right upper sternal border without radiation to the carotids. Pulses are 2+ in upper extremities and 2+ in pedal pulses bilaterally. 2+ pitting edema to her knees noted bilaterally. ABDOMEN: No abdominal distention. Nontender. Bowel sounds + x 4 quadrants. No organomegaly. Normal contour; No palpable masses. GENITOURINARY: No CVA tenderness bilaterally. GU exam deferred. MUSCULOSKELETAL: + Heberden’s nodes at the DIP joints, hands. + Crepitus, bilateral knees. Slow gait but steady. No Kyphosis. PSYCH: Normal affect. Cooperative. SKIN: No rashes. Positive for dry skin.

Labs: Hgb 13.2, Hct 38%, K+ 4.0, Na+137, Cholesterol 228, Triglycerides 187, HDL 37, LDL 190, TSH 3.7, glucose 98.

A:

Primary Diagnosis: Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)

Secondary Diagnoses: Primary Hypertension, Obesity, Osteoarthritis (OA)

Differential Diagnosis: Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD)

Plan:

Medications: Tylenol 650 mg PO Q4 hours as needed for arthritis pain

Labs: UA; Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP); LFTs and TSH; 12-lead EKG, Chest X-ray; Initial 2D echo with Doppler; Ankle-brachial index.

Additional lab results: Echo results 1 week ago: Left ventricular EJ Fraction decreased to 35 %

BNP not available.

As a future FNP, you need to determine the medications for CHF/ASCVD. (Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease).

Questions:

1.    According to the ACC/AHA guidelines, what medications should this patient be prescribed?

2.    Does he need medication(s) given his history of MI?

3.    Considering that you have a case study, you only need 2 posts for this discussion board, 1 initial and 1 reply. As usual, all posts must be supported by at least 2 peer reviewed references and all paragraphs must be cited.

Thanks!

Integration THEMATIC INTEGRATION OF FAITH AND LEARNING PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
Write a thematic integration of faith and learning concept paper using a well-rounded approach to the concepts found in Northouse textbook and current scholarly literature. This paper must be submitted in compliance with the instructions found in the Thematic of Faith and Learning Paper Grading Rubric.

The paper must contain the following components:

1.    A 23-page overview that defines the course (Leadership Theory) as an academic field of study (significance of the course to business).
2.    A 34-page discussion of the top 58 concepts you believe are critical in order to demonstrate that a student who completes this course can synthesize the key concepts in leadership theory and make real-world applications. 
3.    A 23-page discussion that integrates the concepts from the Northouse and Merida texts along with the Bible and other sources to present a cohesive biblical understanding of leadership theory.
4.    A minimum of 10 scholarly journal references; each reference must be less than 10 years old.

The most important part of a coding compliance program are the standards supporting it. The organizations standards of conduct provide the ethical culture expected of all employees. Coding professionals should also understand and abide by AHIMAs Standards of Ethical Coding (See AHIMA Standards of Ethical Coding.
Coding policies and procedures serve as guidelines for coding and billing functions and provide documentation of the organizations intent to correctly report services provided. The policies should include requirements for accurate, complete, and timely documentation and coding practices as well as incorporate the laws and regulations governing coding. Complying with these policies is key in preventing coding errors or reimbursement problems.

To be an effective communicator, you must master the core competency of listening. A willingness to listen during an interaction allows you to understand others, respond appropriately to what they say, and provide helpful feedback. Bevan (2020) describes ideal listening as active and empathic. In this discussion, you will take a listening quiz, and then explain how using active empathic listening can help you improve as a communicator in your personal and professional relationships.

In your initial post,

Using and citing Bevan, define active empathic listening. Report on both meaning and significance of the definition, in your own words.
Complete this listening quiz (Links to an external site.) and report your results and feedback to the group. It is possible you will have to click an icon that says, Run Adobe. If you cannot access this resource, take a similar, text-based version in Bevan (Section 8.3) titled Self-Test: Bodies Active-Empathic Listening Scale.
Explain how you can use active empathic listening to help you improve your communication in your personal interactions or in the workplace.
Provide at least one example of exactly how you can change your listening habits and how you will benefit from this change.
For this discussion forum, your initial post should be 300 to 350 words in length.

Texas is the death penalty capital of the democratic world. Yet the state has one of the highest crime rates in the country. In addition to the ethical issues capital punishment raises, does this prove that the death penalty is ineffective? Discuss with reference to the theories of punishment, deterrence, isolation, and rehabilitation.

4-5 page analysis (do not count the Works Cited page in your page count). Be specific.  Make sure to edit well and cite at least five scholarly sources.
Conform to MLA style when citing sources and composing your Works Cited page.
To facilitate grading, all writing assignments must comply with the following guidelines:

Papers must be completed as a Word document, using one-inch margins, one-and-one half or double spacing, and size 12 Times Roman or Arial font.
Include the following, single-spaced, at the top left of the first page (before the paper title).
Your name and student ID number (i.e., John Doe #xxxxxxx)
Semester, course rubric and number and section number (i.e., 2016SP GOVT 2306-3xxxx)
Name of assignment (i.e., Texas Policy Analysis Paper)
Date
In naming your file include the name of the assignment, semester, course and section number, and your name.  (For example, for your paper, name your file Analytical Paper-2016SP-GOVT 2306-3xxxx-John Doe.)
Papers must be submitted through SafeAssign (to check for plagiarism) as attachments under the proper eCampus Submission Area by the date and time specified in the class schedule.
Papers deviating from these guidelines will be docked 10 points (or more if they radically depart from these guidelines).  Writing a paper demands/requires careful thought, writing, and editing on your part. Lean, muscular prose will be highly prized. Rambling, pointless sentences will be penalized. Cardinal grammatical (subject verb disagreement, sentence fragments, etc.) and spelling errors will be docked three (3) points each. A simple use of spell and grammar check, a process taking mere minutes, will save you many points.

*I just copy paste the instruction, I know some of these things do not apply to you*

INSTRUCTIONS- From your required readings, choose one Supreme Court case or one educational policy pertaining to English language learners (ELLs). In a 500-750 word essay, discuss the effect that this case or policy has had on the education of ELLs. Your essay should address the following questions:

How has this case or policy helped contribute to the academic success of ELLs?
How will this case or policy help improve education for ELLs?
What gaps still exist?
Support your essay with at least three scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

HERE IS THE LINK TO THE CASE TO READ.

https://eds-a-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=8bb29281-a175-49e8-8fbb-0db937d7ecff%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=edswss&AN=000264474200008

1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwlDCHeOpKE&feature=emb_title
2.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohskrSuq8Mo&feature=emb_title
3.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9ZsQv53S_A&feature=emb_title
4.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SzoHL7j-SU&feature=emb_title
5.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5QURxhdJSE&feature=emb_title
6.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au8eyrI9Ta8&feature=emb_title
7.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ak7BChSquoo&feature=emb_title