Address the following topics:
The role of public health nurses
The job of a public health nurse navigator- helping patients get attached to a family doctor, why is this important
How I will take this learning forward to better inform my future practice?
Day: September 4, 2020
Discuss what the article is about, what is the author trying to argue, and what are your thoughts.One-inch margins should be utilized throughout the paper. I also do not want to see any quotes or quotations. See PDF for article; You must not use other sources to write these papers.
Child and Family Case Study
Congratulations! You were selected to move on to the interviews for your dream job in Unit 2. For this stage in the application process, you must create a hypothetical case study for a child and family and document your initial biopsychosocial assessment. In this scenario, you may decide whom the child is living with (such as biological parents, a single parent, a grandparent, another family member, or a foster parent).
For this assignment, please respond to the following:
Subjective and Objective Information
Describe the client demographics (age, sex, gender, race or ethnicity, family composition and history, living situation), reason for referral, presenting problem(s) and a brief description of the agency setting (objective information).
Provide client comments.
For example, child, mother, father, or sister (names) reports or states the following: (subjective information)
Systems Theory Assessment
Analyze how the child in your scenario is impacted from a nature versus nurture standpoint.
Using the ecosystems theory and the person-in-environment framework, please fully explain the presenting problem(s) of the child and the family.
According to multiple systems in the human environment, examine the influences present in the childs micro, mezzo, and macro system.
Analyze how the child in your scenario is impacted from ecosystems theory.
How do social environment and various systems influence the childs behavior?
Include positive and negative system influences such as church, school, peers, family members, neighbors, culture, community services, and the media.
Plan
What are your recommendations and intervention strategies for this child and family?
Ethics, Values, and Self-Care Strategies
What challenges could working with this child and family pose for you as a human service professional?
What personal values or self-bias could potentially impact your ability to work effectively with this child and family?
What ethical dilemmas could present themselves in this case study?
What self-care strategies would you practice to respond to the ethical dilemmas, conflicting values, and self-bias?
Assignment Guidelines
Your Assignment should be a 4-6 page expository essay, not including the title and reference pages, and should include the following elements:
Title page: Provide your name, title of Assignment, course and section number, and date
Body: Answer all the questions in complete sentences and paragraphs, using the provided headings as a guideline in your paper
Your responses should reflect professional writing standards using proper tone and language. The writing and writing style should be correct, accurate, and reflect knowledge of human service theories.
Reference page: Sources in APA format
Include a minimum of four scholarly, academic sources, with one of these references being the textbook.
Use Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced, and left aligned
Use standard 1″ margins on all sides
Use APA Formatting and Citation style
Please read the following chapter in your text: Woodside, M. R., & McClam, T. (2018). An introduction to human services. Cengage Learning.
Chapter 4: Human Services and Ethical Practice
Chapter 4 will discuss ethical practice and decision making in human services and will examine specific skills needed to address ethical dilemmas and make ethical decisions with diverse populations.
Web Resources
Visit the link below for information on ethics in the human services field:
National Organization for Human Services: Ethical Standards for Human Services Professionals. Retrieved from https://www.nationalhumanservices.org/ethical-standards-for-hs-professionals
1The Company based its decision to discharge Mr. Ross on three reasons. What are these three reasons?
2. In addition to the three reasons explained above, the arbitrator cited a fourth reason that was considered by the Company in deciding to discharge Mr. Ross. What is this fourth reason?
3. What is the specific personal safety equipment item that Mr. Ross failed to utilize?
4. Did the Union take the position that Mr. Ross did should not have received any discipline for his actions on May 1, 2006?
5. Did the arbitrator agree with the Companys position that Mr. Ross engaged in several acts of misconduct that ordinarily should warrant discharge.
6. In his award, does the arbitrator uphold the Companys decision to discharge Mr. Ross?
7. What fact about Mr. Rosss work history does the arbitrator mention in explaining how he arrived at his decision in this case?
8. In his award, arbitrator Richard Adelman provides the Company with the authority to require that Mr. Ross do something in the future. What is that?
9. Did arbitrator Adelman agree with the Companys position that the discharge of Mark Ross was for just cause?
10. Is this a labor arbitration case or an employment arbitration case?
Mordecai Kaplans Judaism as a Civilization and Gerson Cohens The Blessing of Assimilation in Jewish History reflect two different approaches to Jewish culture, which are still dominant today. Analyze both works. Answer the following questions:
1. What is Kaplans understanding of Jewish civilization? What does he see as Jewish civilizations essential elements and most important characteristics?
2. What does Cohen mean by the blessing of assimilation? How does his view of Jewish culture and history differ from that of Kaplan? Be specific.
3. In light of information learned from lectures and the textbook, provide your own critique of both approaches and your own reflections on the nature of Jewish culture.
Use information learned from lecturettes and this weeks readings in your discussion.
A well-written paper will have a concise introduction to the general topic of the paper, a clear thesis statement, and a carefully developed argument with specific examples supporting the thesis statement.
Your paper should be written according to the following guidelines.
a. Your paper should be no longer than three pages (typed, double-spaced) and should concisely, clearly express the results of careful thought and prior drafts. In the paper you turn in, dont waste space with filler material.
Avoid generalities not supported with specific analysis and evidence. Anchor your paper in careful analysis of Kaplan’s and Cohen’s articles, not in broad generalities about Jewish culture. You should cite specific passages from Kaplan and Cohen to support your argument.
Do not, however, include long quotations of passages. You are writing for an audience that has read these texts. Instead, quote only what is absolutely necessary for your analysis.
Make every paragraph, sentence, and word count. In three pages you dont have space to waste.
b. The first paragraph of your paper should include a succinct statement of what you are going to argue to answer the questions posed by this assignment. The following paragraphs should develop your argument to support the thesis that you have stated in your opening paragraph. Your final paragraph should build on your argument to lead the reader into some implications of your thesis and argument for understanding Jewish culture. Again, your argument must be supported by specific evidence from Kaplan and Cohen. You are trying to persuade the reader to agree with your thesis statement.
c. This assignment is not a research paper, but you should (as appropriate for your argument) interact with the readings and class discussions for the course. You are also free (but not required) to pursue outside reading.
Find five (5) Scholarly articles by searching online, one each on the following topics
-Critical Infrastructures (2 pages)
-Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) (2 pages)
-Cybersecurity Policy (2 pages)
-National Cybersecurity Strategy (2 pages)
-Security of Internet of Things (2 pages)
* Discuss, in your own words, the following for each article (Please note: each of these points requires discussion, not just one sentence):
-The main point of the article
-The relevance of the article in todays Cyber Operations
-One additional point you would like to see mentioned in the article with justification.
* Requirements
-Title page
-Full APA reference for each article
-Cite where applicable
-Articles must come from searching scholarly articles in the online library. You may NOT use
web references, blogs, regulations, instructions, or policies.
-Each article discussion should be 2 to 4 full pages
APA 7th ed. format must be followed.
Times New Roman 12, 1″ margins.
Must include title page and references.
Submit a single document with all five article discussions.
Throughout your reading and viewing this week, you gained considerable insights into police interrogation techniques and how false confessions can develop. In addition, you have likely reflected on how innocent individuals can be swayed into confessing to crimes they did not commit. Now, you will have the opportunity to explore The Innocence Projects website (link available in the Week 3 resources) and read about its work. Then, be sure to select three cases that you will further analyze as part of this assignment. Your paper must address the following:
Provide a brief summary of the work that The Innocence Project does.
Analyze the three cases that you selected.
Discuss the causes of the individuals convictions and subsequent exonerations.
Reflect on how false confessions develop.
Support your assignment with at least two scholarly resources in addition to the cases from The Innocence Project.
Length: 3-5 pages
THE ESSAY QUESTIONS ARE OPEN BOOK/OPEN NOTES. PLEASE CHECK EXAM DOCUMENT!!!
THESE ARE THE ONLY REFERENCE YOU CAN USE:
1. Trochim (2020) https://conjointly.com/kb/table-of-contents/
2. THE SLIDES ARE IN THE ATTACHMENT
3. group dynamics for teams by levi https://www.scribd.com/doc/249906820/Group-Dynamics-for-Teams-4th-ed-by-Daniel-Levi
*** Please write 1.5- 2 pages for the case study below with 2-3 references from reputable sources. References have to be the lastest and up-to-date, nothing older than 5 years.***
Penny is an 8-month-old girl who is brought in by her parents because of fever and fussiness. Her appetite is poor and she refuses to eat or take most fluids. On physical examination, she has a bright red right TM, dull without mobility or landmarks. Her left TM is pearly gray and mobile. She has yellow nasal discharge; cervical adenopathy and chest clear to auscultation. Her diagnosis is right otitis media. I have ordered prescription (Rx) medications for Penny, ranking from first to third choice.
Rx 1st choice: observation for 72hrs and ibuprofen for pain/fever, 2nd choice: Amoxicillin, and 3rd choice: Augmentin, if allergic to penicillin then Cefdinir
Please explain the indication and contraindications of the drug(s). Please also list the prices of the Rx drugs to treat the problem from two different pharmacies. (example: goodrx.com, Costco, CVS)
Purpose: This discussion will provide an opportunity to synthesize information learned in this module into your own original ideas that are based on evidence and observations from previously published works.
The goals are: 1. To gain a deeper understanding early accounts of human endurance running.
2. To practice critical thinking by creating a logical progression of ideas supported by peer reviewed evidence/observations.
3. To practice writing clearly with correct grammar.
Task: You are required to write a paragraph about how endurance running impacted a individuals in the culture we read and lectured on. Your post should be your own original interpretation of the information we reviewed. You are required to use 1 reference/quotation. There is no required format for this citation, but should state something like “according to title of the paper or the lecture”.
