Topic Image: https://services.wwnorton.com/aws/image?&file=/wwnorton.college.public/coursepacks/history/worlds5/imgs/1404.jpg

Approach:  answer some combination of the the following QUESTIONS AS AN ESSAY. Again, you should present the answers IN THE FORM OF AN ESSAY (Intro, main points, conclusion)

Possible Essay Questions
Observation

1. What type of document is this? (Ex. Newspaper, telegram, map, letter, memorandum, congressional record)

2. For what audience was the document written?

Expression
3. What do you find interesting or important about this document?

4. Is there a particular phrase or section that you find particularly meaningful or surprising?

Connection
5. What does this document tell you about life in this culture at the time it was written?

REQUIREMENTS:
    1. Write an essay (introduction, main points/body, conclusion) of MORE THAN 1100 words;
    2. In your own words – if you must quote, count the cut-n-pasted word count of the quote AND ADD IT
              TO THE 1100 word minimum requirement. 350 words in quotes means the essay should total
              MORE than 1450 words.
    3. Adhere to rules of English grammar, spelling and punctuation
    4. Keep the phrasing in the THIRD PERSON and the tense in the past.
              (“One may conclude” not “I believe”, and “They WERE” not “They ARE”

Essays should be double-spaced, 12pt font, with one-inch margins all around. Citations should be given only at the bottom of the page or end of the paper, as FOOTNOTES or ENDNOTES, NOT IN THE TEXT OF THE ESSAY. However, students are expected to write the entire essay in their own words and SHOULD NOT use quotations. In other words, essays should be ENTIRELY in YOUR OWN WORDS. Footnotes or endnotes, as appropriate, should be the same font size as the text, or smaller, single-spaced, and at the bottom of the page or the end of the paper, NOT IN THE TEXT.

Again, all papers must have an introduction with a clearly stated thesis statement or argument. The introduction should indicate what the paper is about, what arguments will be made, and how those arguments will be supported in the body of the paper. The main body of the paper should develop and support, with detail and examples, those points laid out in the introduction. The conclusion should summarize the findings and/or arguments of the paper, but should refrain from introducing any new facts or arguments. Students are expected to write all exam essays in their own words and SHOULD NOT use quotations from any sources. Correct application of the rules of grammar and punctuation, and accurate spelling, are required. All questions of grammar and punctuation will be resolved with reference to the Chicago Manual of Style. The use of personal pronouns such as I, me, my, and you are always to be avoided. Triple/quadruple spacing between paragraphs is always to be avoided. Direct quotes from primary or secondary sources are always to be avoided. All foreign terms (Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, French, etc.), except names of people, places, or other foreign terms accepted as part of the English language are always to be underlined. Other specifications concerning style will be noted in writing to the class as required. 

The essay should demonstrate graduate level writing competency and should address long term career goals associated with earning a masters in public administration. Discussing passions for public issues or policies is also recommended.

Career goals: commitment to public service, leadership, public policy, and project/program management.

Passion: ambition to become a leader and making an impact on large groups of people.

Clinical Assignment: Quality Improvement Project Part 4  IS BASED ON NURSING LEADERSHIP CLASS. AS A NURSE MANAGER. TOPIC SMOKING CESSATION IN PATIENTS WITH CAD. WILL PROVIDE ALL 3 PARTS IN ATTACHEMENTS

Goal:
To assess a clinical issue that is the focus of the Quality Improvement Project.
Evaluate the clinical project.
Putting it all together for the final Quality Improvement Project.

Part 4 Content Requirements:

Assessment of clinical issue that is the focus of the quality improvement project.
Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the quality improvement process.
Discuss stakeholders and decision makers who need to be involved in the quality improvement project.
Discuss resources including budget, personnel and time needed for the quality improvement project.
Discuss potential strategies for implementation and evaluation.
3 REFERENCES

Litrature

Hello, I am working with my group on a paper for Cat airport train in Vienna.
My part is literature and analysis of the purchasing format  and the relation between the purchasing format and the costumer loyalty.
Find the relation between the Purchasing format (online – offline )  and the costumer loyalty using academic resources . And based on the hypothesis 8 in this presentation (purchase format)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1DMO88dEYZfw15AjdP3Ceu6OgzgKyE0Tk8ADaqK57yeo/edit?usp=sharing .

You should write a literature 2 page and analysis 1 page and half to investigate the relationship between those and the customer loyalty.
Please also don’t forget that you should justify your the hypothesis in the literature and the analysis part .

In the literature you should propose this hypothesis : there is a relationship between the format of purchase (place of buying, offline or online, and so on ) and the customer loyalty. You need to find academic sources that suggest there is a relationship between ‘purchase format’ and the ‘customer loyalty’. Hope everything is clear now 🙂

In the analysis
Talk about the hypothesis
Based on it assume that there is a significant difference between different level on costumer loyalty based on purchase  format and based on the results I say that I accept or I reject
The h8 is Rejected   There is no significant correlation
you can interpret correlation and then interpret results in R ( Since there is weak correlation then u reject the hypothesis )

here is some feedback for the Draft.  An below is our google share so you can understand the concept of what we are doing .

The draft is generally well done, whenever there is code and it is not
short or very short or essential to understand something, it is usually
placed in an annex at the end of the file.

We will elaborate the grade looking at the following key items:

    Formatting
    Executive summary
    Introduction
    Literature review
    Hypothesis development
    Method
    Results
    Conclusion
    Language
    Critical thinking

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1itU-vkj-tnh38vUaj-b0mUe2XOaxTXqZfy_xOHtFiAQ/edit?usp=sharing

A creative title
A clear claim and/or argument
Structure (paragraphs, complete sentences, headings, etc)
Your OPINION on the topic, issue, solution(s)
Tone and strong diction– no fluffy or weak language!
Facts, statistics, examples, current events, and quotes to support the claim (WITH CITATIONS)
A section (or throughout) in which the significance is addressed

A fundamental assumption of administrative reformers in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s was that politics could have only adverse affects on administration. How valid is that belief? Why? How, and to what extent, do current administrative structures and practices reflect that assumption? Also discuss the contributions of various scholars (at least five but preferably more) to the development of public administration as a discipline.

GUIDELINES FOR FILM REVIEW

Texas History

FORMAT:  Your film review will have five parts.

Essays should be typed, double-spaced, one-inch margins all around, 12 point font size, and include a Bibliography.
This is a formal paper, not conversational; DO NOT use words like I, me, etc
You should have a minimum of 3 pages, excluding the Bibliography, and use Chicago Style Formatting.
Part One: Main Characters

Identify the main characters/people/organization and give a brief description of each. Why are they present in the film?
If the film is based on a real person/event, compare reality to the filmed version (you will have to research this).
Part Two: Geographic Location

Describe the geographic and social location/setting of the film. The social location refers to what the atmosphere is like for people based on social characteristics like race, class, gender, sexual orientation, physical and mental ability, etc.
Is this significant to the film?
Part Three: Brief Synopsis

Write a brief synopsis of the film. What do you see as the major theme(s) of the film?
Part Four: Analyze the film

Discuss important turning-points in the film and significant scenes. Look at the time-frame of the film. Does time elapse during the film? Are There Flashbacks? Dream Sequences? Is this necessary to the story line?
Do people have very different stories about very similar events? If so, what may influence that?
What do you think the purpose(s) of the film is and are those purpose(s) achieved?
Part Five: Brief Reaction

Write a brief response explaining your reaction to the film.

For topic (Tucson International Airport) identify current issues, regulations, and practices, and address related legal considerations on your chosen topic, using proper legal terminology throughout. You must cite at least 5 references, one of which can be our textbook, if applicable. 

Please see the attached requirements and topic notes.

Prompt: In 1,000 words, summarize the contents of Romans 18, paying particular attention to its major topics and themes. It is also appropriate to note puzzling features and/or challenges of interpretation.

Parameters: This is an informal paper, so no outside references are necessary, but if you would like to reference a resource, please cite parenthetically, i.e. (Wright, p.17). Your summary should be submitted as a Word document in 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced, and with indented paragraphs, page numbers, and headings when and where appropriate.

Purpose: This summary of Romans 18 introduces you to one of the Bible’s clearest statements of God and his purposes for the world.

Length:  5-6 pages, typewritten, double-spaced, MLA Format; Minimum 5 sources cited in paper.

Subject: Conduct research on any author from the Making Literature Matter text

Review chapter 6 in Making Literature Matter “Writing Researched Arguments.”

Audience: The audience for the research essay is your classmates.  You want to inform them of your findings on the author as well as present your interpretive analysis of one work by the author.

Requirements: Use both primary and secondary sources to develop your essay. Primary sources for literary research are the works created by the author.  Secondary sources consist of biographical information on the author that others have written as well as other writers’ critical essays on the author’s works.

Development: Approximately two thirds of your paper should be devoted to secondary source information covering the author’s biographical details and accomplishments.  About one third of the paper should cover your analysis of one work by the author (primary research). However, if you wish to reverse the proportion for the two sections, that is okay.  Perhaps a third organizational approach might be to devote half of the paper to secondary source material and half to primary material.  It is important that you devote adequate coverage to each section, avoiding the problem of developing the paper mostly on one at the expense of the other.

Research is the process of finding out something about your topic and should begin with questions.  What exactly do you want to know about the author?  Some authorial questions might be the following:

Who is this writer?  When did the writer live and what is the cultural heritage? What types of literature does the writer create? What are some of the famous works? Is the writer well known for a specific way of developing works or for a specific literary genre such as poetry, drama, essays, short stories, novels?  Having read a work by the author, you might ask how do the issues from the work compare or link to the writer’s life?  These and other similar questions will point you in a direction as you examine sources of information.

In developing the primary research, choose one work by the author to analyze in your paper.  For example, let’s say you choose Kate Chopin for the research, and you read her short story in he MLM text  “The Story of an Hour” (p. 714).  Analytic questions about the text might by why is the protagonist Mrs. Mallard celebrating her loss?  Why are the other characters’ assumptions about Mrs. Mallard wrong?  What issues is Chopin exploring in this fictional world?

The analytic questions will help you quickly focus on the information that you are looking for to write your paper.  These also might connect to what you have discovered in the author’s biography.  It is best to attempt to link the issues from the author’s work to biographical details, if possible.  This adds more unity to your research discussion.

Thesis: After reading a work by the author and doing biographical research, for a main claim that best asserts something that you have discovered about this person.  This becomes the thesis of your paper and should be stated early in your introduction.  However, you should draft your introduction last, even though it is the opening of your essay.  It is important to remain flexible and open to new ideas as you are researching.  New discoveries may require you to revise your claim.  Remember that research is the process of finding out new information on a topic.  The thesis claim should best represent what you have discovered.

Your Voice: The “analysis of a work section” of your paper presents your own critical position and thus is “your voice” expressing your interpretation.  The biographical information, while using secondary sources for development, also must contain your brief commentary here and there to make sense of the source information that you have used.  This avoids a strictly “cut and paste” type of research.  For example, if you have discussed many of Edgar Allan Poe’s struggles in life like death, loss, drug use, then briefly comment to make sense of this material: “It becomes clear that Poe faced many challenges in life.  Perhaps these conflicts stimulated his creative expression.”  The introduction and conclusion of your essay should be primarily in your own voice, limiting the secondary source material.

Conclusion: The conclusion of the research paper should reflect the issues that you have developed and on the writer in general.  For example, you might comment on the contributions and merit of the writer.  Does the writer raise valid issues that are important to the reader to contemplate or for society in general?

Documentation of Sources: You must include the list of sources that you used for the paper on the Works Cited page and parenthetical, in-text citations.  Remember that proper documentation of sources is a two-step process.  Consult the Making Literature Matter text (chapter 6, pp. 199-246) for documentation information. You will use MLA (Modern Language Association) format.

Consult p. 203 in Making Literature Matter for an overview of how to evaluate sources.  Review p. 210 for information and examples of MLA in-text citations.  See the New MLA Citation Module on the homepage for examples of MLA Works Cited entries for sources.  Read the student research paper in the Essay Examples on the course page for a model.

E-mail a copy (attach it as a MS Word document) to a classmate for peer editing, using the Mail Tool.

When you are responding to a classmate’s essay, use the following draft checklist.
When finished, e-mail your response back to the classmate.

ESSAY DRAFT CHECKLIST

Is the essay at least 5-6 pages in length plus the Works Cited page?
Does the essay contain in-text, parenthetical citation of sources?
Does the essay cover both primary and secondary source information–approximately one-third to literary analysis and two-thirds to biography? Or one half to analysis and one half to biography?
Is the claim (thesis) clearly stated in the introduction?
Does the conclusion reflect on the issues raised?
Does the student include a “voice” while summarizing the biographical details, making a brief commentary here and thee to make sense of the source information?
Is the subject of the research an author from the Making Literature Matter textbook?