Angst is a term used to describe feelings people may have when they realize they are alone, and neurotic anxiety is a mechanism used to avoid these realizations. Give an example of angst and describe the neurotic anxiety that would be exhibited (that you would expect to see.) Discuss why you would expect a person to behave in this manner based on humanistic views.
Day: September 28, 2020
NTRODUCTION
As a leader in IT management, you must be able to appropriately communicate information in a concise and effective manner to executives.
In this task, you will be asked to propose your IT investment project idea to the CEO and board of directors using the information from the IT project analysis and proposal report that you completed in Task 1. You will record yourself and your presentation using Panopto. In preparation for your presentation, you will construct an email invitation that includes a brief description of your IT investment project idea from Task 1 and an outline of the key points you will discuss in your presentation.
It is required to pass Task 1 prior to starting this task. Please submit a copy of your completed Task 1 for reference with your final submission for this task.
SCENARIO
You are the chief information officer (CIO) of a publicly traded company. You have an IT investment project idea, and you have already compiled your IT Project Analysis and Proposal report. Now you need to present this idea to the CEO and board of directors for their approval.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Construct an email meeting invitation for your presentation. The email invitation should include a concise project description and outline of the key points of your IT project analysis and proposal report from Task 1. The email should be addressed to the CEO and board of directors for your chosen company.
Note: Your description and outline should align to your findings and recommendations from Task 1.
****I have attached some examples to reference to***
Students will write a research proposal to fund a survey that pertains to peanut allergies and children. Your maximum budget for this research is $400,000. You may pick your audience. Make the audience known to the reader in the beginning of the paper.
Your tasks:
Proposals should be formatted using the following guidelines.
– Title Page that includes your name, class and section name, date, project title, name of the agency you’re requesting funding from (funding source), beginning and end dates of the proposed funding period, and total amount of funds requested. (Does not count toward the page limit)
– No Table of Contents needed
– Abstract of your research proposal
– Project description which includes several sub-sections: introduction, problem statement and significance, goals and objectives, methods and procedures, evaluation and dissemination.
– References in APA style (Does not count toward the page limit)Budget with justification
– Appendices (charts, etc.) (Does not count toward the page limit)
you can include graphs and charts
do not exceed more than 6 pages
For this assignment, I would like you to draft ten interview questions for a professional in the Criminal Justice field that is currently working in a criminal justice agency or has worked in a criminal justice agency. You can call an agency of your choice, and ask the supervisor in charge if you can schedule a interview with them that should take no more than 15 to 20 minutes of their time.
Explain to your interviewee that you are going to be asking questions of how they view/supervise the management of their particular criminal justice agency.
The rubric revolves around a interview that is conducive to a virtual format, so please find a professional that is willing to do a virtual interview with you.
Please see the interview rubric for further details regarding your interview assignment but some things to include maybe but not limited to: Was the interviewee open and honest? Did they sound as they provided a “scripted” or rehearsed answer to your interview questions? Was there anything in particular about the interview that stood out to you?
Upload your zoom meeting, face time, skype, Google Hangout, or other virtual format. In the discussion post area, be sure to add your contents/details, and self reflection of the interview process after the interview.
(The only in text citations and references you will need for this assignment is if you choose to relate part of your interview to a published source in your details/self reflection or you are quoting a particular published writing).
Rubric:
Interview
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Relevance
30 %
Excellent
Relevant questions are asked. Interviewer stays on topic and does not wander from question. Recognizes key words in the profession and answers regarding interviewee skills by mentioning them in introduction.
Good
Most of the questions are relevant and connected. Interviewer stays mostly on topic. identifies at least two skills from the interviewee.
Fair
Some of the questions are relevant and connected. Interviewer stays mostly on topic but may stray occasionally.
Poor
Questions are all over the place, does not seem relevant to interviewer or interviewee. OR the interview is not conducted.
Quality Questions
30 %
Excellent
The interviewer asks at 10 or more insightful, in-depth questions that may not be answered in one word. There is a sequence to the questions.
Good
The interviewer asks 7 to 8 mostly insightful, in-depth questions that may not be answered in one word. There is some sequence to the questions.
Fair
The interviewer asks 5 to 6 insightful, in-depth questions. There is little sequence to the questions.
Poor
The interviewer asks few questions that are answered in one word. There is no sequence to the questions.
Follow-up/preparation
30 %
Excellent
Interviewer communicates well and knows what s/he is going to say. Asks 2 or more clarifying questions that may not be answered in one word. There is a sequence to the questions.
Good
It is obvious, most of the time, that interviewer practiced. S/he communicates well and ask at least one clarifying question.
Fair
It is not quite obvious the interviewer practiced. S/he communicates but may need support. Does not ask any clarifying questions.
Poor
It is obvious the interviewer has not practiced. S/he did not communicate well or know what to say.
Style10 %
Excellent
Interviewer is poised. Does not fidget, speaks clearly, and loud enough for audience.
Good
Interviewer is mostly poised. Does not fidget much, speaks clearly, and can be heard by the audience.
Fair
Interviewer is nervous. Does fidget, does not speak clearly, nor loud enough for audience, can still be heard but slightly.
Poor
Interviewer is nervous, unprepared. S/he fidgets, does not speak clearly, or loud enough for audience. Eye contact is lacking and/or audience is never addressed.
To complete this assignment:
1) Choose two principals to interview regarding their school schedules, one from elementary (PK-5) and one from secondary (6-12). Arrange and schedule your interviews. Because you will receive hours towards your practicum for conducting these interviews, they may not be conducted by e-mail. Principals are very busy people. You’ll need to start this well in advance and leave room for re-scheduling when things fall through.
2) Use the information from the readings in this module and your personal experience(s) to craft between 8 and 10 interview questions regarding:
The different types of schedules they have used
Reasons for choosing the current schedule
What the principals see as their objectives for scheduling
The approach they take to scheduling
How scheduling impacts student learning
If you’re really gutsy, throw in a couple of questions based on the “look 4s” in the NASSP article. But be careful–you may step on some toes!
Anything else you want to know about
3) Conduct your interviews, being sure to take plenty of notes. You also want to take the opportunity to have them walk you through their schedules. Get a copy of the schedule and really figure out how it works.
4) Complete a two page, double-spaced reflection that synthesizes the information from the interviews and addresses, at least, the following topics:
What did you learn from the principals about scheduling? (Be specific here–this part should be at least a page!)
What do you think will be your strengths/weaknesses in terms of scheduling?
What concerns you about the scheduling process?
What else do you need to know or learn?
Please answer both questions 6 sentence or more each question.
Please use only text I provide not any outside sources.
Questions
1.Describe the role of women in Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerica. Provide Concrete examples?
2.Describe the gender dynamics during the colonial period in the Central American region. Explicate the role the race, class, and gender played in colonial Guatemala?
Please let me know what you are doing the paper on in a few sentences so that I can get the topic submitted and approved by 9/20 10PM.
I am requesting 4 full pages of content for the report itself and 1 for the annotated bibliography in addition to the reference page. I also need a thesis statement and a one-page outline of the paper.
I have to submit the annotated bibliography, then the thesis statement with the one-page outline of the paper, and then the paper. It is 3 steps and 3 separate grades.
You will thoroughly describe and critically evaluate an ethical dilemma you are facing or have faced in your workplace.
Write a paper that describes and evaluates an ethical dilemma you currently face or have faced in the past in your workplace. If you have not personally faced such an ethical dilemma in your work, you may evaluate a dilemma commonly found in your profession.
You must demonstrate your ability to make an ethical case using your own ideas, while substantiating your thinking through the application of concepts and ideas from course resources and outside references. Incorporate these concepts and ideas deeply and thoughtfully, reflecting on their application to your own experience as a professional.
Requirements:
Your paper should be 5-7 pages in length, double-spaced, not including a title and reference page. Your paper should be formatted in accordance with APA style. An abstract is not required.
Your paper should be written in essay form, with an introduction (and thesis statement), a body, and a conclusion.
Transitions between each section should be clear and logical, and the body should include evidence to support your ideas.
Use a variety of course materials as sources to inform your writing. Be sure to properly cite all references.
Incorporate a minimum of three references from outside the class that relate to your subject. These should help substantiate your claims.
Use in-text citations for all referenced materials, using proper APA format.
You will not resubmit your annotated bibliography with this paper, however, you should reference any sources from your annotated bibliography that you used in your paper.
NOTICE: This assignment is based on two readings and is due in two weeks from now. This assignment could be extended to the second page. You are expected to start working on your draft and keep editing it while attending the Plenary lectures and our class next Thursday.
Reading from ” Computing machinery and intelligence” by Alan Turing; ” Minds, Brains and Programs” (allegory of the Chinese Room) by John Searle.
The assignment question:
Strong Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the claim that computers can think. Describe Searle’s Chinese room thought experiment and explain why it presents an objection to Strong AI. What would Turing reply to Searle?
