I hope you are safe and healthy. As you know, your final project is due by October 20. Normally, this project would consist of you attending a concert and then writing a concert report based on your experience. However, due to the ongoing pandemic, you are not required to attend an event in person. Instead, you are to watch a full, unedited concert online that fulfills the requirements and then write about that, as if you were there. If you are having trouble finding an event, here are several links that contain acceptable streams/concerts for this project:City Music Foundation: http://www.citymusicfoundation.org (Links to an external site.)

New West Symphony: https://newwestsymphony.org/live-online-events/ (Links to an external site.)

Chicago Presents: Anthony McGill: https://chicagopresents.uchicago.edu/concert-stream-anthony-mcgill-clarinet (Links to an external site.)

Snake River Music Festival: https://www.dercumcenter.com (Links to an external site.)

London Oriana Choir: https://www.londonoriana.com (Links to an external site.)

Bergen Philharmonic Orchestra: https://www.bergenphilive.no/concert-archive/ (Links to an external site.)

Chamber Music Society of Lincoln Center: https://www.chambermusicsociety.org/watch-and-listen/ (Links to an external site.)

London Philharmonic Orchestra: https://www.lpo.org.uk/online-concert-archive.html (Links to an external site.)

New York Philharmonic: https://nyphil.org/playson (Links to an external site.)

If you choose something on your own, that’s fine too – just make sure it conforms to the guidelines I’ve posted for the project, and run it by me for approval.

utcomeType of Concert Experience Attended

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The concert program attended was of the type specified in the project assignment descriptors and was appropriate for the project assignment.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Good

The concert program attended was somewhat of the type specified in the project assignment descriptors and was somewhat appropriate for the project assignment.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

The concert program attended was not of the type specified in the project assignment descriptors and was not appropriate for the project assignment.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

No concert program attended.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Appropriate Musical Terminology

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Extensive and accurate use of appropriate musical terminology and vocabulary taken from the text and the class activities.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Good

Adequate use of appropriate musical terminology and vocabulary taken from the text and the class activities with a reasonable degree of accuracy.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

Little to some use of appropriate musical terminology and vocabulary taken from the text and the class activities with a variable degree of accuracy.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

No use of appropriate musical terminology.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the Concert Repertoire

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Impressive discussion of the works performed on the program.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Good

Adequate discussion of the works performed on the program.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

Little to some discussion of the works performed on the program.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

No discussion of the works performed on the program.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerformance Evaluation

60.0 to >53.0 pts

Excellent

Insightful evaluation of the quality of the performance.

53.0 to >47.0 pts

Good

Adequate evaluation of the quality of the performance.

47.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

Little to some evaluation of the quality of the performance.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

No evaluation of the quality of the performance.

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Experience

60.0 to >53.0 pts

Excellent

Thoughtful and insightful personal description of the concert experience to the student attending.

53.0 to >47.0 pts

Good

Adequate personal description of the concert experience to the student attending.

47.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

Little to some personal description of the concert experience to the student attending.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

No personal description of the concert experience to the student attending.

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure of the Concert Report

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Organization and structure are clear and easy to follow. Transitions are elegant and smooth.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Good

Organization and structure can reasonably be followed. Transitions are adequate.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Fair

Organization and structure are not clear and/or not easy to follow. Transitions need improvement.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer. Paragraphs are disjointed and/or lack transition of thoughts.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat of the Concert Report

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Report follows all designated guidelines and is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Fair

Report follows some designated guidelines and/or is over/under the appropriate length as described for the assignment.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Good

Report follows most designated guidelines and/or is over/under the appropriate length as described for the assignment.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

Report lacks many to most elements of correct specified formatting and/or is inadequate or excessive in length.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Punctuation, and Spelling

30.0 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

26.0 to >23.0 pts

Fair

Report contains some grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

23.0 to >0.0 pts

Good

Report contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

0.0 pts

Does Not Meet Requirements

Report contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

30.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0

Identify Geographical Location by IP Address
Geo IP solution to identify country, region, city, latitude & longitude, ZIP code, time zone, connection speed, ISP, domain name, IDD country code, area code, weather station data, mobile network codes (MNC), mobile country codes (MCC), mobile carrier, elevation and usage type.

Accurate Geolocation
IP2Location is a non-intrusive IP location lookup technology that retrieves geolocation information with no explicit permission required from users. All you need is your clients IP addressIdentify Geographical Location by IP Address
Geo IP solution to identify country, region, city, latitude & longitude, ZIP code, time zone, connection speed, ISP, domain name, IDD country code, area code, weather station data, mobile network codes (MNC), mobile country codes (MCC), mobile carrier, elevation and usage type.

Hankla, Charles and Daniel Kuthy.  2012.  Economic Liberalism in Illiberal Regimes: Authoritarian Variation and the Political Economy of Trade. International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 492-504.

McGillivray, Fiona.  1997.  Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs.  American Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 584-607.

Kono, Daniel Y.  2006.  Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency.  American Political Science Review 100 (3): 353-368.

Kim, In Song, John Longregan, and Marc Ratkovic.  2019.  The Effects of Political Institutions on the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade.  International Organization 73 (4): 755-792.

In this course, you will be asked to select one case study and to use it throughout the entire course. By doing this, you will have the opportunity to see how theories guide your view of a client and the clients presenting problem. Although the case may be the same, each time you use a different theory, your perspective of the problem changes, which then changes how you go about asking the assessment questions and how you intervene.

The first theoretical approach you will use to apply to a case study is systems theory. In other words, your theoretical orientationyour lenswill be systems theory as you analyze a social work case study.

Different theories can be used to take a systems approach. For example, Bertalanffys General Systems Theory considers how a system is made of smaller subsystems that influence each other and seek homeostasis, whereas Brofennerbrenners Ecological Systems Theory focuses on how an individuals experience is influenced by different system levels (micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono). Systems theory is commonly used to understand the interrelationships of the systems (e.g., family, community, organizations, society) of the client. If you are working with families, communities, and organizations, it is also beneficial to use systems theory to get a holistic picture of all the interrelated parts of the system.

To prepare: Select and focus on one of four case studies listed in the Learning Resources. You will use this same case study throughout the course.

Read the first three (3) chapters of the text, Cheaper by the Dozen by Frank Gilbreth, Jr. and Ernestine Gilbreth Carey (attached here and located free online). What management theories are described in the book? How did the Gilbreths apply their theories in their family situation? How do you think their family situation inspired new management ideas?

https://books.google.com/books?id=dQRPAQAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=cheaper%20by%20the%20dozen%20gilbreth%20book&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

will attach management theories and additional info.

The following must be included:
1. Executive Summary (a paragraph summarizing the topic)
2. Table of contents (not included in page total)
3. Introduction to the disease 
4. Pathophysiology (natural history)
5. Epidemiology (this should be the largest section and should state who, what, where, 
    why)
6. Treatment
7. Prevention
8. Summary
9. References (not included in page total)
    INTERNET OR WEB SITE REFERENCES ARE ALLOWED ONLY TO REFERENCE A
    DOWNLOADED CHART, TABLE OR GRAPH OR DIAGRAM AND ONLY FROM A .GOV WEB 
    SITE
10. Appendices (not included in page total) Tables, figures, and diagrams do not count against the page limit.

** the paper should have section headings and subheadings as appropriate
** 6-8 references
** 1.5 spaced

Write a profile essay of 400 – 450 words in which you describe your selected place. Reminder: an essay should contain an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Include a thesis statement at the end of the introduction that focuses on some aspect of the place that the reader will find intriguing or unusual.
Rely on showing via sensory impressions (sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and tactile sensations) rather than telling. Hint: use action verbs (i.e., explode, roared, bloomed, ran, etc.) rather than passive verbs of being (i.e., is, was, were, are, etc.)
Bring attention to the uniqueness of the place, showing what is remarkable about it.
Present a portrait of the place through a specific angle of vision. That is, convey a dominant attitude toward the subject, an attitude (i.e., fascination, disgust, amusement, detachment, joy, etc.) that can be implied through details or stated explicitly.