Discussions should be: logical and well-formulated, thought provoking and open-ended, and inspire deeper discussion about the significance and applications of the ideas discussed in the assigned readings. In addition to posting your initial question, you are also required to post a minimum of 2 thoughtful responses to questions posed by your classmates
Follett, M. (1926). The Giving of Orders. Scientific Foundations of Business Administration (pp. 156-161). The Williams & Wilkins Co.
Assignment Information and Deliverables:
See the assignment description and data files provided below.
Ask your questions about this assignment in the Solo 2 Huddle. If you have a question about the assignment description document. Please refer to the part you are asking about by referencing it by line number.
Formatting:
Submit to this link: Paper Adobe Acrobat pdf. Make sure your last name is at the beginning of the file name, and that the filename includes “solo-2.” Don’t exceed the maximum number of pages, which is seven (7), all inclusive. Be sure to number your pages. You don’t need to include a title page/cover sheet, or an executive summary. See the assignment description for additional information.
You would need the following files for Solo 2.
Project Description: Predict450Solo2ProjectDescription.pdfPreview the document
Respondent Data: stc-cbc-respondents-v3(1).RData
Task Design File: stc-dc-task-cbc -v3(1).csv
Effects Coding File: efCode.RData
Data Map: stc-v3-datamap.txtPreview the document
Extra Scenarios with effect coding: extra-scenarios(1).csv
Extra Scenarios with original Coding: extra-scenarios-v3.csv
This is the largest assignment. Your task will be to research and report on a culture or subculture. Elements of your submission: Topic choosing is Vietnamese Culture
– Title – clearly specifies the culture in focus
– Introduction – shortly describe the culture
– Culture overview – describe the lifestyle, beliefs, values, unique characteristics, rules and expectations for members of the subgroups.
– Members as employees – identify how the uniqueness of this group relates to the members’ functioning in the workplace.
– Conclusion – reflect on your learning.
The report should be 3 pages, readable font, clearly formatted with 1-inch margins.
Four documents: Press release, Media Advisory
the format of both is attached below.
all each one page
I have the boiler plate for Press Release:
“Building on a distinguished history dating back to 1908, Montclair State University is a leading institution of higher education in New Jersey. Designated a Research Doctoral University by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, the Universitys nine colleges and schools serve more than 20,000 undergraduate and graduate students with more than 300 doctoral, masters and baccalaureate level programs. Situated on a beautiful, 252-acre suburban campus just 12 miles from New York City, Montclair State delivers the instructional and research resources of a large public university in a supportive, sophisticated and diverse academic environment.”
the PR writing module 2 assignment has all the information you need for the assignment WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHERE/HOW info,
Chevrolet is investing money into the parking deck. for Montclair state university parking the parking on campus is complicated, this will resolve this issue. The press release is to inform student/facility.
Please read: Osbourne , Archetypal Metaphors (see attached)
Please read the rhetorical artifact analysis paper: The Simpsons (see attached)
Provide a summary of the relevant arguments from the Osbourne article, including quotes and key terms.
Then, in your next paragraph, explain how the findings in the rhetorical artifact analysis paper (The Simpsons) help you respond to these arguments. Explain how you plan to respond: will your analysis offer additional support to the original argument, apply the claim/argument more widely or extent it to a new kind of artifact, disagree about the classification, point out an oversight or overgeneralization? In other words, explain how your analysis helps you talk back to that original argument. Provide some details and textual evidence to help your reader understand the point you’re trying to make.
Here’s an example summary-and-response argument paragraph to give you a more concrete sense of what you’re aiming for:
Source: Michael C. McGee, “The “Ideograph”: A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 66.1 (1980): 1-16. Print.
-Summary Paragraph: In this article, McGee introduces the term ideograph. Usually a single word or short phrase, ideographs are one-term sums of ideology. More specifically, McGee argues that the ideograph is based upon a way of thinking that possesses both symbolic and material value, so it allows us to more clearly identify positive and negative frames in political discourse. McGee states that human beings are conditioned, not directly to belief and behavior, but to a vocabulary of concepts that function as guides, warrants, reasons, or excuses for behavior and belief…when a claim is warranted by such terms…it is presumed that human beings will react predictably and autonomically (McGee, 6). Such a “vocabulary of concepts” is culturally specific; because cultures differ so vastly, no cultures ideographs or political discourse are exactly the same. Ultimately, McGee argues that ideographs both unite and divide us, and when an ideograph is not used in its normal manner, society will oftentimes inflict stigma upon those who stray from the norm.
-Response Paragraph: In my analysis, I will apply McGees notion of the ideograph to analyze the notion of marriage. More specifically, I plan to equate the ideograph of equality with that of marriage like equality, marriage is an ideograph that unites our society. Nearly everyone can say that they support it; however what equality (or marriage) actually means is ambiguous and ill-defined. The debate over the legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most current and prominent issues of equality that our nation is facing, which, in turn, gives us a need to analyze the notion of marriage. I will use my analysis of my artifact (Rachel and Marys wedding) to argue that their union was an extremely powerful rhetorical performance that proved how the notion of marriage possessed characteristics of a socially constructed ideograph: marriage contains aspects of both materialism and symbolism, it is constantly changing, it warrants the use of power, and it conditions us to ideologies and sets of beliefs (for example, that lust is bad unless safely contained with marriage, and that people who are unmarried are dangerous, immature or irresponsible). I will argue that Rachel and Marys wedding shows in our evolving society we must and already are – re-examining the ways that we view and perceive the “ideograph of marriage”.
During Unit IV, VI, and VIII, you will be working on an implementation plan for a business. The components within these three units combined will create this plan.
Please take a look at the 30 case studies located in your textbook on pages 370625. There are multiple corporations that provide a large array of services and products. Please select one of these 30 organizations that interests you. You will use this company for the Unit VI and Unit VIII assignments, as well.
For Part 1, describe the company that you selected, the products/services they offer, and the history of the company. Next, analyze the companys strategy, mission, and organizational structure. In your analysis, include the information below.
What does the strategy, mission, and organizational structure say about the company?
What are the positive aspects of the strategy, mission, and organizational structure?
What are the companys short-term and long-term goals?
What are ways to improve the strategy, mission, and organizational structure?
Much of the information you will need to complete this segment can be found in the case study in the textbook. However, you are welcome to conduct further outside research as needed. Some details, such as the short-term and long-term goals, may not be explicitly stated. Please use your best judgement and analytical skills to determine that information.
Your project must be a minimum of two full pages in length, not counting the title and reference pages. Include an introduction
this is a formal written report that explains what was done and why it was done. Your written analysis should lay out your ethical reasoning that shaped your perspective on this issue, detail the actions that you took, suggest what the impact of your action was, and reflect on what you learned about this issue and about social justice from the experience.
The following is a list of questions/statements may help you complete the action paper:
Provide a detailed accounting of your action
How much time it took
Why you selected this action as opposed to some other
How the action affected you
The responses you received to your action
What impact you think your action had.
One of the goals of this project is to enable you to gain a better sense of yourself as a moral agent. Reflections on your action can contribute toward the achievement of this goal.
*** The service I did: before the coronavirus, I used to volunteer at Shepherd’s Hope every other Thursday for 5 hours. I used to help with translation, from English to Creole. I helped to check-in and checking out patience. I love helping others and that why I volunteer there.****
Shepherd’s Hope helps the uninsured and underinsured in Central Florida raising awareness of the issues they face and providing access to free high quality, compassionate medical care. They help everyone get medical care with no fee.
link to Shepherd’s Hope:
http://www.shepherdshope.org/about-us-2/
HOW THE PAPER WILL BE EVALUATED
Evaluation Criteria:
The overall coherence of the social justice issue and the analysis. Was the action thought through and executed well and does the written analysis demonstrate this? Is the purpose of the action clear and was it appropriate for this course?
Does the written analysis demonstrate sufficient breadth and depth on the issue addressed? Were there moral perspectives on the issue and does it treat those other perspectives fairly?
Logical relationship between injustice and the action. Does the action taken reflect well the social justice perspective the analysis articulates?
Insightfulness of the observations/conclusions. Do the observations/conclusions show the sense of social justice? Is there a sense of what the author learned through the experience and what contributed to or hindered that learning?
Clarity. Does the paper have a clear sense of progression?
Mechanics. Are the grammar, spelling, sentence structure, and paragraph construction in good shape so that they contribute to the analysis and do not confuse the reader? Do they provide appropriate information? Does the bibliography or reference page follow proper format?
I need a 4 to 6-page critical assessment paper on The Dilemma of Jehovah’s Witness Children Who Need Blood to Survive.
I attached the article that needs to be critically assessed and documents from the teachers’ expectations. She said at least 3 pages need to be about the critical assessment of the author’s article.
Isabelle Allende, And Of Clay Are We Created:
http://scroninger.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/7/6/23767971/and_of_clay_are_we_created.pdf
The reporters story is about one girl. He becomes focused on her alone as people die and the earth shifts around him. Who is Allendes story about; who does she focus on as changes happen to many characters? Choose one of the three primary characters in the story (the narrator, the reporter, the girl) and create an argument in essay form about why Allende makes this character the center of the story. Use textual details to support your answer.
rubric –
Correct MLA formatting, in-text citation, Works Cited page format and citation: up to 10 pts.
Content, including quality of research, textual support for claims, and organization: up to 50 pts.
Please review all content in the course about creating effective literary analysis.
Mechanics: Strong thesis statement, spelling, grammar, and punctuation: up to 15 pts. Review thesis statements, and run grammar and spell check on every draft.
Derive themes from any chapter/s in the text. A 5 page, double-spaced will articulate a topic of inequality you find to be most important. For paper, select a City of your choosing (e.g Los Angeles or San Francisco or Phoenix) and employ one or a few key theories from the book to read its dynamics. (Community & Urban Sociology theories and key terms)
Additionally, your topic of choice could also be derived from a chapter topic in the text. The online text also contains hyperlinks to supplementary documentaries, lectures, and important websites, along with some unique case studies. You should use these to your advantage.
Text is free online at: fong-urbansociology.yolasite.com
Username: Traffic (capitalize t in traffic)
Pass: onvalleyblvd
