Chapter 1 Case Study – The Department of Homeland Security

How does the creation of the Department of Homeland Security affect resources traditionally designated for local criminal justice organizations?
Are there too few resources to fight both terrorists and traditional criminals?
Who should pay the burden for investigating, apprehending, prosecuting, convicting, sentencing, and incarcerating terrorists?
Should Osama Bin Laden have been taken alive?
What are the due process protection questions in light of the creation of the Department of Homeland Security?
Should these due process protections matter in the fight against terrorism?

Locate evidence that supports your stance on the topic.
Cite specific claims from at least two of the sources provided that support your position.
Use outlining techniques presented in the previous sections of this lesson to plan your paper and organize your notes.
Use MLA formatting to create in-text citations and a Works Cited page.
Quote information from the articles or video provided as needed to strengthen your position.
Review rules related to MLA citation and use of quotations as needed.
Use the Revision Assistant site to obtain personalized feedback and proofreading help (a link to the site will be provided later in this lesson).
Edit and proofread your paper.
Review rules related to grammar, usage, capitalization, and spelling as needed during editing and proofreading.
Make sure the final draft of your paper is at least 500 words.

For your second article critique, find a scholarly research article using the same criteria as your first critique. However, your second article must use a different experimental design than your first critique. For example, if your first study used a classical experimental design (pre-test/post-test with a control group), your second study must be something other than a classical experimental design, such as a time-series or cohort design.

All other requirements remain the same. Again, this must be a scholarly, empirical research article related to your topic and/or research question.

Locate one research article using an experimental design related to your project topic and research question. Read the entire article, not just the abstract. Be sure to write the critique in your own words and cite appropriately. Use APA style (abstract not required). Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, excluding the cover and references pages. Further guidelines for writing an article critique can be found herePreview the document.

Research Topic I: “Are There Other Western Countries That Have Found Triaging Calls For Emergency Response Between Police And Mental Health Professionals Helpful In Defusing Potential Deadly Interactions Between Individuals And First Responders?”

Directions: Write a five paragraph essay (an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion) that addresses how the concepts we have been discussing with the text create a theme. Unlike an expository essay, an analytical essay cannot just state that something obvious is true and provide an example. You must use your supporting evidence (quotes) to show how something implied is true and how it affects a larger point. For the purpose of this first essay, you will choose one of the following three options as your thesis statement:

In The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas, the reader learns that identity constantly develops as one grows.

In The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas, the reader learns that the feeling of being included influences one’s identity.

In The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas, the reader learns that feeling empowered is difficult, but becomes easier with a support system.

Format and Structure:
Introduction = A hook that focuses on the idea of the first concept of focus mentioned in your chosen thesis statement. You then address the purpose of that concept. Then end with the given thesis statement.

Body Paragraph 1 = You address one reason the thesis statement is true and seen in the text how identity is developed, or how feeling included influences identity, or how feeling empowered is difficult but easier with a support system. This response to the thesis is known as your topic sentence. This focuses on the how. You need to include a quote with a proper MLA citation, and your analysis focuses on how the quote you provided proves the reasoning and ideas addressed in the topic sentence. The analysis in the paragraph will focus on how the concept is seen and the impact of it in the text. Basically, you are proving how the thesis statement is true in the quote you provided.

Body Paragraph 2 = Same as paragraph one, except it focuses on a different reasoning and different quote to show why the thesis statement is true.

Body Paragraph 3 = Same as paragraph one, except it focuses on a different reasoning and different quote to show why the thesis statement is true.

Conclusion = Start with a rephrased version of the thesis statement, which can be broken into two sentences. Then, summarize the main ideas from your body paragraphs in 2-3 sentences. Lastly, end with addressing the importance of know this — how it can be applied to society or why the reader should care about the concepts in the thesis statement.

End-of-Course Reflection [due Mon]
Assignment Content

Create a reflective and applied statement describing how the week’s learning has affected your thought processes, development, and professional disposition. This statement should reflect your personal learning process (challenges, moments of discovery, life experiences, and interactions). You may also include questions for the course facilitator regarding material that may still be unclear. Ideally, you will use these reflections throughout the course and the program to document your development as a scholar, practitioner, and leader, and to reflect critically on the changes that occur during this process.

Format any citations and references in your reflective statement according to APA guidelines.

Personal Philosophy of Teaching Assignment Directions
This week, you will develop your personal philosophy of teaching in a written statement, articulating your beliefs about important educational theories and practices. Your teaching philosophy should be based on what is meaningful to you in your approach to teaching.

Note: As your experiences and beliefs about teaching grow and change, your philosophy will also change. Therefore, at the end of this course, you will submit your revised teaching philosophy with a brief discussion of how your philosophy has changed or developed during this course.

There is no right or wrong way to write a personal teaching philosophy. However, for the purpose of this assignment, please follow the assignment guidelines below to connect your beliefs, goals, and strategies into a coherent approach to help students learn and grow.

Assignment Guidelines

Philosophy Paper Requirements

The paper should be 24 pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.
Use a first person narrative and present tense.
Write sincerely, uniquely, and memorably. Avoid clichs, jargon, and technical terms.
Include specific (not abstract) ideas, using 12 concrete examples, whether actual or anticipated experiences.
Show humility and mention students enthusiastically.
Include your conception of how learning occurs.
Communicate your goals as an instructor.
Include actual or anticipated teaching strategies and methods.
Include justification for why you teach (or anticipate teaching) the way you do.
Include a brief discussion of how your teaching (or anticipated teaching) facilitates student learning.
Include a conclusion.
To assist you in developing your teaching philosophy, you may choose to include any or all of the following:

Famous quotes
Your personal experiences as a learner
Your views of the educational system
Your interest in new types of teaching and learning
What you think students should expect from you as a teacher
How you know your goals for students are being met
How you create (or anticipate creating) an engaging or enriching learning environment, and specific activities or exercises to engage your students

Discussion 1:
The diversity of both students and faculty poses important considerations for teaching and learning. Reflect on the characteristic differences in gender, race, and culture, as well as the differences among the diverse generations in todays nursing education classroom. When considering your personal philosophy of teaching, discuss how you might use these characteristic differences and diverse backgrounds and experiences of todays nursing students as a teaching tool to connect students to nursing content and increase their understanding. In other words, how might you incorporate the background and experiences of your students into your teaching methods to enhance the ability of all students in your classroom to think critically and problem solve patient-care issues?

Discussion 2:
Nursing faculty is responsible for creating an environment that is conducive to learning and accommodates the multiple learning styles and abilities of students. As a nurse educator, how might you design learning experiences for class and clinical environments to promote positive and effective learning for all students? Do you think students should use their preferred learning styles and perhaps risk becoming rigid and unable to learn in different ways (should a situation demand a different learning style)? Or should educators encourage students to be open to different methods of learning, moving them away from their comfort zones?

Same as previous discussions. 1 page with reference per each discussion.

Observe the student in a social situation that is non-academic (e.g. recess, lunch, play). This observation should help you gather data on how the student interacts with others. Observe how a child interacts with other children.

Does the student play with different or only the same children?
Does the student share?
Does the student initiate activities or waits to be invited? What kinds of activities does she enjoy with others?
How does a student interact with teachers and other adults?
Is the student able to ask for help?
Does the student require a lot of attention or direction? Does the student ask for constant praise?
Does the student enjoy talking with the teacher?
Does the student spend time with adult visitors in the classroom?

The Observation must include detailed information in all of the following: description of the context, description of students activities, comments, and inferences.
-Description of students activity is related to the area of development and reported in detail.
-Description of students activity is written as an objective account of behavior.
-Inferences are connected to the behavior observed, and their connection is explained in clear and elaborate fashion.
-Inferences are substantiated with references to at least 2 relevant theories of development and supported by 3 course readings.
-Inferences include a clear and elaborate description of the students developmental abilities and needs in the specific developmental domain and suggestions are provided for supporting the students development. 

Choose a numerical estimation problem, for example : What’s the highest number of points ever scored by a professional football team during a game? or How long would it take a soccer ball to fall from the top of the Empire State Building? Make sure you look up the correct answer.

Set up two separate groups (3 or more people each). The group members can be friends, family members, coworkers, etc. They should not be other students in this class. The two groups do not have to be in the same room or even work on this at the same time. You will use the same question for each group.

Group One will be the control group. Ask them your estimation question. Tell them they may not ask you questions, receive outside information, or look up the answer or any related information. Ask them to estimate the answer to your question and come to a consensus on the answer. Observe the process they use to reach an answer.

Group 2 will be the test group. Ask them your estimation question. Tell them they may not ask questions, receive outside information, or look up the answer or any related information. Instruct the test group to start by having each group member share with the group two pieces of information they know that they think might be helpful to estimating the answer. After each person has shared their two pieces of information with the group, they should estimate the answer to the question and come to a consensus on the answer. Observe the process they use to reach an answer.

See which group, the control group, or the test group, comes closest to the correct answer.

In this thread, tell us:

1. What estimation problem did you use?

2. How did they work? Did leaders emerge, and if so, who were they?

3. What kind of information did people in the test group share, and how did it help them?

4. Which group (control or test) came closest to the correct answer?