1) Be sure to read the tutorial on Lanham’s Paramedic Method. There is no way to complete this assignment without that tutorial. It will help you recognize prepositions, “is” forms, and figure out how to replace them with active verbs. It will also explain how to calculate the “lard factor.”

2) Choose five of the most convoluted, tortured sentences from your final project rough draft. Copy and paste them into a separate Word document. Keep the original version alongside the revised version so that we can see the changes that you have made.

3) Apply the Paramedic Method to those five sentences and bring them back to life. The problems may be different in each case. Some will have “is” forms that you can eliminate. Some will have too many prepositions. Some will start with a bunch of “blah, blah, blah….” that you don’t need. Figure out the right fix for each sentence and cut out as much “lard” as possible without altering the meaning and nuance of the original sentence. It’s not enough to simply cut out information and make the sentence shorter. Keep all the relevant information and improve the readability.

4) Choose five of the most convoluted, tortured sentences from your peer’s final project rough draft. Copy and paste them into your “Paramedic Method” Word document. Apply the Paramedic Method to those five sentences and bring them back to life. (See #3 for additional guidance.) When you proceed to the next step, keep the original sentence alongside the revised version so that we can see the changes that you have made.

5) After you’ve trimmed, re-arranged, and modified everything from those sentences that does not spark joy, calculate the lard factor for each one. How well did you do? Remember, it’s not about cutting out information and making the sentence shorter. I won’t give you credit if that’s all you do.

1) As with all other assignments in this class, this exercise has a word limit. Your entire post must be 75 words + a single word title. Your post will be 76 words total.

2) Your title will announce the topic of your post. Your topic must be a noun – a person, place, or thing – that you encounter or engage with on the day that you write your post. An exception to the one word rule will be made if your noun is something like, for instance, Mr. Robot.

3) Mr. Robot cannot be the subject of your post.

4) Your topic cannot be yourself, your family members, friends, pets, or any other subject about which you have already written in this class or plan to write about for the final project.

5) Your post must consist of 5 sentences of 15 words each (75 words total).

6) All five sentences must be about the word you have selected for your title. None of your sentences can include the word that is the title of your post.

7) Two of your sentences must be empirically verifiable statements. One of your sentences must be either a value claim or an interpretative claim. One of your sentences must be in the future tense.

8) The middle of your third sentence must be a short direct quote seamlessly integrated into the sentence. The full citation you provide at the end of your post will not count against your 76 words.

9) The text that you quote must be from the year in which you were born (i.e., it must have been originally published that year, so no re-prints of Plato!).

10) The first word of your post (after your title) and last word of your post must be the same word. Five points extra credit if the two words are homonyms (Links to an external site.).

Identify and analyze a social welfare policy with respect to its effectiveness in addressing poverty and its correlates. Begin by thoroughly exploring the nature of the social problem and then analyze the impact of the social welfare legislation, answering the ultimate question: is it effective? This paper will focus on poverty among the LGBTQ+ community in the United States and if current legislation and programs are effective.

Paper needs to be written in APA format (7th edition), with a minimum of 10-15 peer-reviewed references. It needs to include a title page, abstract, content, and reference page.

Topic: Poverty among the LGBTQ+ community in the United States.

Analyze the social problem (about 3 pages):
1. What? Define the problem: Thoroughly define the social problem drawing from peer reviewed literature. All statements of fact must be supported by one or more citations. If there are varied definitions, include them and explore the differences. For instance, the federal government defines homelessness as people who live in unsheltered locations, such as on the streets, in homeless shelters, in cars. Homeless advocacy organizations use a broader definition to include those living in motels, couch surfing, or doubling up. Therefore, federal counts are lower than advocacy organization counts (by millions), which has implications for funding. This type of discrepancy is important to explore. The questions youll be answering are: what causes poverty?

2. Who? Demographics: Who does the problem affect? You should still begin by providing broader demographics. For instance: In 2019 there were 38 million people in the United States who lived below the poverty threshold (Smith & Davis, 2020), 15 million of whom are children (U.S. Census, 2020). Child poverty has increased significantly in the last xx years (citation, year) in fact, according to most recent statistics available, xx children live below the federal threshold and xx children are considered low income (citation, 2020; citation, 2020). Also consider these demographic factors: region, gender, race, age. Basically, you want to paint as detailed a picture as possible regarding who is impacted by the social problem.

3. Why? Risk Factors: What are the risk factors associated with the social problem? What increases someones chances of becoming poor? These are not causes, but more correlates. Perhaps the research shows that certain ethnic minority groups experience an increased risk for certain social problems, or someones gender or age increases their risk, or perhaps its having a childhood with trauma and abuse. Also consider structural issues, such as a bad economy or a poor school district, racial or gender oppression. All of this information will be in peer reviewed journal articles.

4. How? Consequences: What will happen if theres no government intervention? Increased learning disabilities in children? An increase in crime? An increase in health problems? Increased risk of domestic violence? (sometimes the risk factors are the same as the consequences). All of this information will be in peer reviewed journal articles.

Policy Analysis Section (about 3 pages)

Discuss how TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) addresses the social problem of poverty among the LGBTQ+ community in the United States.
Describe the legislation and related program(s). Youll likely draw from existing policy literature for this portion of the paper, such as policy analysis briefs from nonpartisan think tanks. And then describe the legislation and the program in detail. What is the history of the legislation? How has it changed through the years? How does the legislation define the social problem? The legislative goals will often be included in the legislation and may reference perceived cause(s). What are the criteria for acceptance into the program? What are the benefits? What is the delivery system? How is the program funded? What government agency/ies are responsible for facilitating the program(s)?

Analyze the Legislation
Youll then evaluate the effectiveness of the legislation (Personal Responsibility & Work Opportunity Act of 1996, for example) and associated programs to determine whether there has been a positive impact on the problem (i.e., reduced poverty). Does the legislation define the social problem accurately? (consistent with the literature). Do the criteria exclude anyone? Are the benefits sufficient? Is the delivery system effective/efficient? Is the program funded sufficiently? Examples may include defining poverty in a way that doesnt account for systemic factors, the federal poverty threshold being too low (again, all based on research you read and then cite), programs that arent funded sufficiently based on needs referenced in peer-reviewed research and/or government stats.

Lastly, make recommendations with possible solutions for making the legislation and/or programs more effective and more equitable (based on your readings and own analysis).

An Overview of The Article Analysis (Attached)

The purpose of writing an article analysis is to demonstrate that you have read, understood, and can apply scholarship in the public administration field, especially in program evaluation, and to demonstrate critical thinking abilities. Typically, an article analysis does four things:

1) Provide an introduction
2) Summarizes an articles main points.
3) Analyzes the evidence offered to support the writers main point, taking care to point out where there are flaws in the argument.
4) Reflects upon the significance of the article, its connection to other reading/concepts in the course, and/or its importance in your field, with some concluding remarks

Format:

Introduction  (1 paragraph)

state the title of the work, the authors name and the date of publication
outline main ideas of the book and identify the authors thesis
state your own thesis statement and your main idea about the work
The article is an …… because the author (s) … The article title by is ….. and insightful because

Summary (about 1.5 pages)

briefly outline the main ideas of article
should involve who, what, where, when, why and how
you may also choose to discuss the structure, style or point of view
This article is about… The setting is…
The main …
The theme is…
The author argues that… The research was
The main points are… The authors conclude

Analysis (2 pages)

critically state what you like and do not like about the article
explain your ideas with specific examples from the article
assess whether the author has achieved their intended goal
the analysis may look at whether the work is
focused, understandable, persuasive, clear, informative
original, exciting, interesting, well-written
directed at the appropriate audience, meeting the purpose
well researched, with appropriate conclusions, and more…
The analysis is made up of several different paragraphs.

Conclusion (half page)

restate your thesis in new words
summarize your main ideas if possible with new and stronger words
include a call to action for your reader
You must read this article because … or This article is not useful because”

Question: Why socialism? As we have seen in class, many social thinkers believed that socialism is the best foundation for organizing society and its economy. However, different people could espouse very different understandings of what socialism is and why it is superior to other forms of social and economic organization. Discuss, using the writings by Sidney Webb, George Orwell, and Albert Einstein, and drawing on Smalldone and lecture for historical context

Requirement: write a 5-6 page typed, double-spaced paper (not counting title page and endnotes page) based solely on assigned readings and lectures. Remember to place the works you discuss in their historical context. In other words, think chronologically
As a rule of thumb, your paper should average at least 3 citations per page
Formal footnotes or endnotes are required when citing your sources. Use the Chicago Manual of Style for your citations. Go to chicagomanualofstyle.org . Click on Citation Quick Guide and then click on go to notes and bibliography style. There you will see how to cite just about any kind of source that you would use in this paper. Each section in the notes and bibliography style shows you how to cite something if its used in a footnote/endnote (simply called Note here), e.g. a book, edited volume, journal article, etc Dont confuse the notes citation with the bibliographic citation

In from Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, Carol Dweck shares her perspective and theory about how we have misunderstood achievement, success, and how we may unintentionally be reinforcing them. Compose an essay in which you summarize Dwecks argument, her main points, and her most important examples.

Then, draw your own conclusions about the impact of these two mindsets on your life. Where do Dwecks observations about independence, conformity, and emotional maturity match up with your personal experience? Alternatively, where does your experience counter or complicate what Dweck has to say?

TOPIC:
How did the emergence of consumer society affect democracy in the United States? Did the nation become more or less democratic during the 1950s?

INSTRUCTION:
You are to write a response in essay format that includes an introduction, response to the question, critical analysis of the subject, including facts to support your analysis, and a conclusion.  Excessive use of quotes will result in a lowered score! Again, you must provide critical analysis of the readings and not simply a restating of the facts the authors present.

USE PICTURES/BOOK I HAVE ATTACHED FOR THEY WILL HELP USE CITATIONS FOR THE ESSAY. USE CORRECT CITATIONS AND SHOWING CITATIONS!!!!!!

BOOK:
McGerr Michael, Oakes James, Lewis Ellen Jan, et al Of the people: A History of the United States. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Create a professional presentation of your evidence-based intervention and change proposal to be disseminated to an interprofessional audience of leaders and stakeholders. Include the intervention, evidence-based literature, objectives, resources needed, anticipated measurable outcomes, and how the intervention would be evaluated. Submit the presentation in LoudCloud for feedback from the instructor.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
patient with diabetic foot ulcer, resources and funding.

Investigate about Hemophilia and write an essay about it.  The questions provided above are to motivate you to investigate about this topic; you do not need to answer them one by one. The essay must be at least five paragraphs long, and each paragraph must contain at least five sentences (you can write more than five paragraphs and more than five sentences per paragraph if you wish to do so). The content of your essay must be written entirely in your OWN words.  Use in-text citations in parenthesis, APA style, if you paraphrase information from other authors. Paraphrasing is not copy-pasting or copying and changing a few words from other authors’ writings – it is writing it in your OWN words to explain the authors’ writings. Only when necessary, you can quote, but these quotes do not count towards the last tally of the number of paragraphs and sentences required from your OWN writing.  You must cite at least THREE references you used to investigate about this topic at the end of your essay (use APA style). 

Constrained and Unconstrained
No unread replies. No replies.
At first glance, Charles Portis’s story about “a strange writing factory” seems to be the antithesis to Louis Bury’s “On Writing on Walking.” One celebrates the absence of all restrictions and impositions on writing while the other suggests that constraints are what give written communication its meaning.

1) After reading Portis’s story and Bury’s essay, identify one thought about writing that both share in common. Note that in the case of Portis, the thought will be expressed by one of his fictional characters.

2) In explaining the similarity that you identify, you will also need to summarize their thinking about constrained and unconstrained writing.

3) Support your analysis by quoting from each. Provide a page number in parentheses at the end of the quoted passage. You do not need to provide a full citation with your post.

4) Your post should be between 250 and 300 words. Posts that fall below that word count will not receive full credit.