Consider how data analysis contributes to safe, high quality, efficient delivery of healthcare. Investigate the role of information management in the evaluation of outcome achievement and provision of data to drive strategic decision-making. Identify one specific data point for which information is collected within a healthcare system. Develop a 4 – 6 page paper to address the rubric expectations; use a minimum of 5 scholarly sources to support your work.
1. Provide an introduction to the paper.
2. Explain one selected data point and the purpose for the collection of this data within the healthcare system. Describe how this data point measures quality, safety, and/or efficiency within the system. Discuss one internal or external benchmark surrounding this data point that serves as a measure or indicator of success.
3. Describe a case scenario where outcomes regarding this data point fall short of meeting the required benchmark. Identify the stakeholders impacted by the poor outcome, and the consequences realized by each stakeholder. Discuss the potential impact on organizational quality, safety, and/or efficiency that results.
4. Describe how outcomes surrounding this data point reflect organizational performance regarding quality, safety, or efficiency. Explain how the data in the case scenario can inform strategic decision-making to improve organizational outcomes. Create an action plan to correct the poor outcomes noted in the case scenario. Explain the action steps, stakeholder involvement, influencing factors that will impact the plan.
5. Provide a conclusion to the paper.
Month: December 2020
Four page essay(1200-1400 words), in which you effectively argue a position on a controversial issue IN THIRD-PERSON ONLY. Include 3 sources ( I have attached my annotated Bibliography and Outline for your reference). MUST have an introduction with a hook, a brief discussion introducing the controversy, and a clearly stated thesis that states a claim or argument that takes a position on the issue (the thesis should be the last sentence in the intro). FIRST body paragraph should acknowledge the oppositions view, fairly and accurately. This means you present (not argue and supportjust present) the main points of the oppositions view in third-person (NO FIRST-PERSON IN THIS ESSAY). BODY paragraphs of your essay should refute the main arguments of the opposition and support your thesis claim with solid evidence and appeals taken from your academic sources. You MUST introduce all of your sources correctly and quote at least once from each of your three sources. MLA FORMAT. DOUBLE SPACED. WORKS CITED PAGE. I have attached the assignment requirements from my professor, an annotated bibliography and outline. They all pertain to the paper so PLEASE READ them and include in the essay.
To structure your writing,
Your audience will be a group of colleagues or community members who are unfamiliar with these ideas. Be sure to explain in a way that shows that you understand and can explain the information.
Your role is that of someone who has just learned this information and has chosen to share it with your colleagues.
The format will be a three- to five-paragraph written piece.
The purpose is to explain ELLs, the four domains, and challenges to acquiring a second language.
You are writing using an academic information style in your discussion (see The Informative Essay (Links to an external site.) for assistance).
Children or Students in a K-12 Learning Context
Adult Learning Context
Read from your primary text:
Chapter 1: The Faces of Diversity
Chapter 2: Language, Learning, and Culture
Read from your primary text:
Chapter 2: Language, Learning, and Culture; 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4
Read Deng and Zous 2016 article A Study on Whether Adults Second Language Acquisition Is Easy or Not: From the Perspective of Childrens Native Language Acquisition (Links to an external site.).
Answer the following questions in your original post.
Who are English language learners?
Explain the four domains of language and what we might expect from students in each proficiency.
How can culture shock and other factors impede learning?
Answer the following questions in your original post.
Who are English language learners?
Explain the four domains of language and what we might expect from students in each proficiency.
How can culture shock and other factors impede learning?
In the play, Sunny states “I want to be a living memorial.” Do you believe that The Exonerated serves as a living memorial to those most affected by the play’s content? Provide two examples from the play to support your opinion.
Backstory
I have provided a problem to be explored through a course announcement. Imagine that your proposed solution is one of the many ideas that a panel of experts are receiving and you are competing with the other groups to win the bid. Is your idea the most innovative? Is your idea the best? Have you justified the idea so well through incredible written communication that the experts will have to choose your idea?
Directions
Your team will research the problem giving a full analysis of the accuracy, assumptions, and relevancy of the information you found. Your team will thoroughly present and analyze one plan for action in report form. Within the report, there will be a complete write-up stating the plan and justifying this choice. A thorough and comprehensive job on this report would be a minimum of five pages and could take much more than that. Five peer-reviewed references are required. These are the only requirements leaving all else open-ended for group preference to inspire creativity. However, if you want more information and/or examples of potential formats, please view the slides here: Consultant report.pptxPreview the document. Five peer-reviewed references are required. These are the only requirements leaving all else open-ended for group preference to inspire creativity. However, if you want more information and/or examples of potential formats, please view the slides here: Consultant report.pptxPreview the document
Grading
A rubric is provided which explains the expectations and point distribution for this assignment. For instructions about how to view the rubric (opens in a new window) (Links to an external site.)check out the Canvas Guides.
Or here is a picture:
Project Rubric
Rubric
Consultant Report
Consultant Report
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Defines and Describes
Exceeds: Creative challenge is clearly and comprehensively described including the purpose of driving the process of innovation and the particular needs and interests of the target audience. Meets: Creative challenge is clearly and moderately described including the purpose of driving the process of innovation and some of the particular needs and interests of the target audience. Developing: Creative challenge is somewhat described including the purpose of driving the process of innovation but does not consider the particular needs and interests of the target audience. Beginning: Creative challenge is minimally described and may just “follow directions” without understanding the purpose of driving the process of innovation or considering the particular needs and interests of the target audience.
threshold: 6.0 pts
8.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
6.0 pts
Meets Expectations
4.0 pts
Developing
2.0 pts
Beginning
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Generate and Select Ideas
Exceeds: Thoroughly (systematically and methodically) develops several original ideas, evaluates the quality of ideas, takes different perspectives to elaborate, uses ingenuity and imagination, and seeks out and uses feedback and critique to revise. Meets: Develops some original ideas, evaluates the quality of ideas, takes different perspectives to elaborate, uses ingenuity and imagination, and seeks out and uses feedback and critique to revise. Developing: Develops one original idea, uses ingenuity and imagination, and seeks out and uses feedback and critique to revise. Beginning: Reproduces existing ideas, does not elaborate or ask new questions, and does not seeks out and uses feedback and critique to revise.
threshold: 6.0 pts
8.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
6.0 pts
Meets Expectations
4.0 pts
Developing
2.0 pts
Beginning
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identify Sources
Exceeds: Information is presented with the source(s) to develop a comprehensive analysis. Sources are varied promoting divergent and creative perspectives. Meets: Information is presented with the source(s) to develop a coherent analysis. Sources are varied promoting some divergent and creative perspectives. Developing: Information is presented with the source(s) to develop an analysis, but sources do not promote divergent and creative perspectives. Beginning: Information is presented with minimal source(s) and does not develop a complete analysis and does not offer divergent and creative perspectives.
threshold: 6.0 pts
8.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
6.0 pts
Meets Expectations
4.0 pts
Developing
2.0 pts
Beginning
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Target Audience
Exceeds: Specific ideas are sufficiently supported, imaginative, takes into account the complexities of an issue, and powerful to the particular audience. Limits of ideas are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within the ideas. Meets: Specific ideas are somewhat supported, imaginative, take into account the complexities of an issue, and powerful to the particular audience. Limits of ideas are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within the ideas Developing: Specific ideas are stated with limited support, imagination, complexities of an issue, and/or powerful to the particular audience. Limits of ideas are acknowledged. Others’ points of view are synthesized within the ideas. Beginning: Specific ideas are stated with limited support, imagination, complexities of an issue, and/or powerful to the particular audience. Limits of ideas are not acknowledged. Others’ points of view are not synthesized within the ideas.
threshold: 6.0 pts
8.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
6.0 pts
Meets Expectations
4.0 pts
Developing
2.0 pts
Beginning
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Value and Style
Exceeds: Conclusion(s) and related consequences of ideas are clear, practical, solved the defined problem or need, and combines different elements into a coherent whole based on available evidence. Meets: Conclusion(s) and related consequences of ideas are clear, practical, solved the defined problem or need, and supported based on available evidence. Developing: Conclusion(s) and related consequences of ideas are somewhat clear, practical, solved the defined problem or need, and supported based on available evidence. Beginning: Conclusion(s) and related consequences of ideas are not clear, practical, solved the defined problem or need, and supported based on available evidence.
threshold: 6.0 pts
8.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
6.0 pts
Meets Expectations
4.0 pts
Developing
2.0 pts
Beginning
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
8.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0
Topic: a specific issue/ policy/ theoretical analysis. For example, Global Policy Responses to Terrorism since 2011
Use at least 5 peer reviewed sources using JSTOR or Google scholar. You may use reputable blogs and newspapers in addition to the peer reviewed material.
Substance: No historical narrative. No use of first or second person (No I or You). No arguments for which you cannot present evidence. Page limit does not include figures, appendices, data or bibliographic material.
Introduction- with thesis sentence/ question setting up the paper (1-1/.5 pages)
Historical background (if necessary) 1-1.5 pages max
Substantive analysis 5 page minimum.
