1. Revisit the modules throughout the course to consider your previous thoughts on the study of history and reflect on how your thinking on history has evolved. Then respond to the following question.

Now that you are coming to the end of this course, has your perception of history evolved since module one? Why or why not?

2. Niccol Machiavelli once stated, “Wise men say, and not without reason, that whoever wishes to foresee the future must consult the past; for human events ever resemble those of preceding times.” With this quote in mind and reflecting on your research this term consider this question:

Choose a contemporary issue and describe how your perception of that issue could have changed based on your research of your topic?

In response to peers, explain whether or not you share your peer’s perception of the selected contemporary issue. Why or why not?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.

1) Most people think in categories of this life and the life to come. In the Gospel of John, Jesus says,Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life (John 5:24) .  How does this claim impact how you think about this life and the life to come?

2)  In the fourth Gospel Jesus is both the Lamb of God (John 1:29) and the Good Shepherd (John 10:11).  Which metaphor for Jesus do you like better and why?

3) Some people feel the Book of Revelation is disturbing and dangerous. Others find it attractive and appealing. (Be sure to note the global perspective at this point.) How would you account for these differing views?

How do you view the Book of Revelation, especially if it is read as a series of cycles/spirals?

4)  In my introductory video I made connections between three parts or thirds in John and the Jewish festival/calendar year. Here I made a connection with the Old-Testament related themes like God’s giving life through water, the Spirit’s help in the wilderness, and Jesus being with his temple/household/family. Please pick one of these three themes and provide your reflections on it from a biblical and/or a personal perspective.

1.What is the role of non-verbal communication?

2.Why do you think that assessing non-verbal communication in a therapeutic interaction with clients is important?

3.Is there always congruency between verbal and non-verbal messages?

4.How do you think COVID-19/PPE will impact your ability to recognize nonverbal cues with your patients? How might it impact the patients ability to recognize your nonverbal cues?

https://www.ted.com/talks/russell_foster_why_do_we_sleep?language=en
The essay length should be 3 – 6 full pages. If your paper is not three FULL pages long, you will not earn a grade.
The essay should be double-spaced.
Use standard 12 pt, Times New Roman font.
The paper should be in MLA format.  Use your textbook.  MLA format includes the format & location of the page numbers, identifying information, title, etc.
Use specific information.
Offer examples! Avoid generalities and abstractions.
By the end of the essay, the reader should have a clear understanding of the subject and the focus.
Write using a third-person point of view.
Give the essay a title that is specific and interesting.
The introduction must introduce the reader to the speaker of the talk, the title of the talk, and the subject of the talk.
The thesis must name the speaker, the talk, and reveal your analysis.
The introduction should begin with description or action. Avoid statements like the following: “I’m going to tell you about” OR “In this essay”
The conclusion should wrap-up the subject.
Concentrate on solid paragraph structure. Each paragraph should have a main point (topic sentence) and supporting evidence.
Organize the essay so that ideas flow from one paragraph to the next; use transitions.
Avoid run-on sentences and fragments.
Avoid tense shifts; be consistent.
Proofread the essay and correct grammatical errors.
The essay needs to have a focus. Avoid offering an overview or providing a random list of facts.

What effect did Hurst v. Florida and Perry v. Florida have on Florida’s Death Penalty? What is the state of Florida’s death penalty law after Poole v. State? In your opinion is it better for a defendant’s sentence of death or life to be decided by a jury or judge?

Individual Report: Book Summary and Key Takeaways (maximum 4 pages) |  Read the assigned book What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20 by Tina Seelig and write a report summarizing the book and the key takeaways from it. In the conclusion section, discuss the opportunities that you want to create for yourself over the next 10 years.

Link to book: http://dl.motamem.org/what_i_wish_i_knew_when_i_was_20.pdf

This paper must include :

1) How determining the prevalence of Vibrio spp in blue crabs from the Maryland Coastal Bays can benefit by using predictive modeling

2) The benefits of using Metagenomics to investigate the microbial community in blue crabs from the Maryland Coastal Bays

3) The benefits of using Antibiotic Resistance  to determine the genetic susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus  in blue crabs from the Maryland Coastal Bays

4) The benefits of using Whole Genome Sequencing  to determine the genetic diversity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus isolates in blue crabs from the Maryland Coastal Bays

ALL CONTENT MUST INCLUDE THE HUMAN AND ENVIROMAENTAL ASPECTS.

For this assignment, you are being asked to reflect on your socialization process. Choose one of the following agents/institutions of socialization and write a reflective paper analyzing your experience of socialization through this institution:

Family

Peers

Education

Media

Religion (Catholic)

Specifically, the following elements must be addressed in one cohesive paper, not an outline not as a list of numbered answers but one flowing paper.

1.

A. What is socialization?  What are agents of socialization?

B. Explain which agent of socialization you chose and why you chose to analyze it.

2.

A. Give a description of your chosen institution, and what it was like. For instance if you choose family, describe what your family is like? how many people? what are they like? If you choose school, what kind of school public? private? big or small? what type of neighborhood? If you choose peers, don’t just generalize and say my friends, name them, is there one friend in particular or a group? what are they like? paint a picture for me so I have a sense of what the agent of socialization you chose is like.

B. Describe your experience with it and how it shaped you. What did this institution socialize you to believe about yourself, others, the world etc. How and in what ways did this institution help to form your identity and your sense of self? Please be specific and provide examples.

C. What were the benefits and what were the problems or drawbacks in the way you were socialized by said institution? Be sure to clearly label what you consider a benefit and what you consider a drawback.

3. Conclusion

This paper should follow these formatting guidelines:

Minimum 2 page paper (ideally not more than 4-5 maximum)

References are not required for this paper, but if you do cite material, include a citations page in APA or MLA Format, this does no count as one of your 2 pages.

use 12 point

Times New Roman font

one inch margins on all sides

double-spacing

no title page.

Same book as last one.
EXAM QUESTIONS
Chapter 5: (minimum 500 words)
In chapter 5, the authors explain that when EPA set the NAAQS for lead, it did not set a standard that would protect the most vulnerable populationinner-city children who already had high blood levels of lead from paint and other sources. Explain this situation in detail. Is this permissible under the CAA? Is it another indication that EPA takes cost and technical feasibility into account in setting NAAQSs?
Chapter 6: (minimum 800 words)
Discuss at least 6 crucial factors underpinning the ozone regimes effectiveness. How many of these does the climate regime share? Which differences between ozone and climate explain why addressing climate change remains so challenging?
Chapter 7: (minimum 800 words)
Explain how the Clean Air Act takes a largely health-based approach to regulating pollution (in chapter 5) and the CWA primarily takes a technology-based approach. Is one approach better than the other? If so, which approach, and why? Are there difference between air pollution and water pollution that you believe calls for taking different approaches in the two statues?
Chapter 8: (minimum 800 words)
Discuss each of the various regulatory approaches to toxic substances described in chapter 8 (health- based, feasibility, and risk-benefit). Which approach is best? Why? Is there any reason why the government should take different approaches in different statutes?
Chapter 9: (minimum 500 words)

If you were amending CERCLA, which funding approach would you support for NPL sites? What are the benefits of purely public funding? If you were relying on private funding, which classes of parties would you make liable?