There is debate around using clinical judgment and actuarial judgment (i.e. use of standardized, normed, measurement tools vs. clinical observation/interview) when assessing and diagnosing clients.  Using the attached articles, answer the questions: What are the key points of this debate?  Is one better than the other? Are both necessary? Why or why not?  What are the pros and cons of each assessment approach?

Select 2 metathoughts from Levys Tools of Critical Thinking, that you find particularly relevant to helping you consider this debate and explain how these tools help you to reason through your thoughts on this issue.  In constructing your answer please make sure that you clearly and thoroughly explain how each metathought applies to this debate while using examples from the assigned readings to illustrate your point. 

This is an Informative Speech. I will provide you a guideline and please follow the directions on it.  I will provide the sources that you need citations for. I will upload 4 sources for you and another source you can pick. It cannot be blogs or unidentified websites, or Wikipedia.
I need at least three proper 3 part Oral Citations, My outline must have appropriate APA “in text” citations. Include an APA  reference with the sources.
I will provide an Example Outline that you can try to follow and IF you have questions please email me . Thanks again.

Using the sample professional liability insurance policy.  LOCATE the various provisions:

    Limits of liability
    Declarations
    Deductibles
    Exclusions
    Reservation of rights
    Covered injuries
    Defense costs
    Coverage conditions and supplementary payments
———————————————————————————————————————-
I have attached the sample professional liability insurance. Please include at least 1 scholarly source

Research paper/article* : 3000 words min (10 pages times new roman double spaced etc. – 13 pages or 3900 word MAX). This will be the main outcome from the class. In this paper, present your research findings in a way that both expands upon and responds to an existing body of knowledge, to an academic audience, producing new knowledge, using qualitative, quantitative, humanities and/or mixed methods. We will discuss several available forms and structures for the research paper/article, including the IMRAD paper.

* At least 5 academic, peer-reviewed secondary sources expected in this project. More is wonderful (but not expected), and a mix of public/academic sources beyond this is also wonderful (but not expected).

Portfolio: Includes both a brief response to our Writing Program Portfolio prompt (2-3 pages), which I will grade + our two major papers (research paper final draft + ekphrasis/analysis

Ekphrasis of a Text: (600 words). In rhetoric, an ekphrasis is traditionally an elaborate visual description, meant to use words to bring a vivid image for an audience to picture and behold. For your ekphrasis, I will allow expansion of this visual tradition into the five senses: vision, hearing, smell, taste, touch. Using Anthony Bourdains Kitchen Confidential (Food is Good excerpt, under files) and a chosen chapter of Stuff Matters (also under files) as models, consider applying one or more of the five senses to a particular item or text. By item, I mean a print text, image, setting, artifact, or pattern of your choice (this can include digital media as well). It will help, for this short assignment, to stay focused in a particular direction, item, and sense or two. Be as descriptive and detailed as possible. For this stage, do not yet attempt an analysis; here, you are representing through words a particular sensation and observation of a specific element.

Analysis of  Text: (900 words). Building from your ekphrasis, now break down what you have described and speak to the larger purpose, concept, and/or meaning of what you have observed (considering what is interesting, strange, and/or revealing/important about your observations). Since analysis breaks things into parts, it might help to be inductive here: think about the different elements you observed and why they matter, why they stood out to you, and why they are unique. Be sure to draw your analysis from your details, and your observations of those details. What can you express about your items features that might not be thought of, at first glance? What can you uniquely uncover and discover about this item? Then, approach an overall impression and interpretation of your item in your conclusion. Although this is a shorter essay, and this may therefore be your comfort zone, DO NOT impose a five paragraph theme structure onto your analysis.

Original, primary research is expected of you here: well get into all methods of primary research (textual, qualitative, quantitative) and how you can do these from home in greater detail once we get started on this component of the class. To sum up briefly, these could include online surveys, auto-ethnographies, phone or zoom interviews, in person interviews of those you live with, cyber ethnographies of websites/blogs/comments sections/etc., online surveys (which may include our media reports), close observations (which may or may not include the ekphrasis/analysis project), analyses of texts/images/artifacts from home, etc. The point of primary research in our WRIT courses is to ensure close analysis, to build critical thinking skills, and also to give you the opportunity to make interesting, unique observations and findings and to add to a larger conversation to avoid the summing up of what other scholars say and what has already been said that you might have suffered through in projects past.

Watch Best Years of Our Lives  (1946) and consider a few possible good candidates for scene or sequence analysis.
Genre cannot be reduced to individual parts or units of meaning. And yet, the way that genre operates in general is tied to the look and feeling of a film’s cinematography, acting style, lines of dialogue, lighting, and sound. So in this exercise the goal is to break a scene down into its most basic elements and then write about how those elements operate in the service of the larger purpose of the social problem film.
Begin by stating clearly and in very direct terms what aspects of the scene are most closely connected to the impression of this genre. You will find this easier to do if you reach for something that will be supported by some of the evidence that you are seeing. It should not require any plot summary or any description that takes you away from the scene. It needs to address the question: what are the components of this scene that are most closely tied to the film’s adherence to or departure from the genre? What do you see or hear that lends connection to the viewer’s understanding of this film’s supposed social commentary or close relationship to a real social issue? What, we want to know, is connecting STYLE to PURPOSE?

In a 1 to 2-page paper, address the following:
Briefly explain Piaget’s and Erikson’s theories of development. Who had a better theory of human development: Erikson or Piaget? Please offer detail to explain your choice.
What tips would you give to someone who has just suffered a major loss, now that you know the stages of grief?
Use references from the 10 slides attached and include APA in-text citations.

Read the following vignette carefully. After reading the vignette, follow the attached diagnostic summary template format provided and write a summary explaining your reasoning for how you came to the diagnosis in the problem list (OCD). If a differential diagnosis was required/considered, explain exactly how you made the decision to go with one diagnosis over the other.  If comorbid diagnoses are required, explain why this was necessary and describe how the client has two distinct illnesses in your diagnostic summary. In other words, you need to explain how your diagnosis/diagnoses best explains the clients presenting issues.  You must justify not only your primary diagnoses, but any rule outs you make.  Please be mindful of Z/V Codes.  A comprehensive diagnosis and summary is required.

Please follow the format of the Diagnostic Summary Template provided.

The literature review should have different parts in order:
1. Entrepreneurship in general (definitions)
2. Enhancing Entrepreneurship ( you may include models and current frameworks)
3. Entrepreneurship in UAE (its position in UAE)
4. The structure of entrepreneurship in UAE ( you may  Include the low number of Emirati entrepreneurs in UAE) also, you may add that mindset is contextual by country not universal

Research sources should be credible journals and scholars

The literature review should have different parts in order:
1. Entrepreneurship in general (definitions)
2. Enhancing Entrepreneurship ( you may include models and current frameworks)
3. Entrepreneurship in UAE (its position in UAE)
4. The structure of entrepreneurship in UAE ( you may  Include the low number of Emirati entrepreneurs in UAE) also, you may add that mindset is contextual by country not universal

Research sources should be credible journals and scholars

This prompt is asking you to:
1. Select a chapter from Gretchen Rubins The Happiness Project that you are reading in this unit a. April, May, or June are the choices
2. Focus on Rubins theme and central argument of the chapter
3. Write an essay in which you select an audience (age range and/or gender) and persuade them to
follow some or all of Rubins advice in the chapter in order to raise the audiences happiness
4. Select, vet, analyze, and quote from a minimum of two other sources that support Rubins ideas
5. Be sure to use ethos, pathos, and/or logos to persuade your reader
6. Remember to add the so what portion of the paper your readers will need to know why it is
important that they are taking Rubins advice