Good parenting and good teaching have something in common. They both aim for loving our children well. Is that a walk in the park all the time? Of course not. If it were, we wouldnt need courses like this to help us through. The questions you now need to ask yourself are:

What type of parent or teacher would you want to be?
How would you best communicate?
How would you discipline?

Part A-Identify a television show or movie for EACH of the following below :

one that depicts an authoritarian style of parenting
one that depicts an authoritative style of parenting
one that depicts a permissive style of parenting
Explain the effect that EACH of the three styles has on the children in the show.

Part B

Select one (1) of the communication topics from (effective communication, reflective listening, or problem solving) Create a parent-friendly flyer describing at least two (2) ways that parents might use your selected communication strategy with young children.

Part C

For the scenario below, determine which type of related consequence is most appropriate. Provide two (2) supporting facts to justify your answer, citing your sources.

Scenario: Basilo was pretending to cook dinner in the house area when Salena grabbed a plate away from him and said, Boys dont cook. Basilo replied, Yes, they do. My daddy cooks! as he grabbed onto the plate. The children continued their tug-of-war until you intervened.

** My training topic is cultural sensitivity and diversity training.

For this assignment:

Give a brief overview of your training plan topic and background. Remember you can create a fictitious company and training. Try to make this project work for you!
Create at least one lower-order and one higher-order learning objective. You will use these Learning Objectives as part of your Final Project. These objectives will be the foundation on which you will build your plan. As you design it, you might add more objectives (particularly as you dive into the task analysis next week and pick the particular knowledge and skills needed by the trainees).
Your objectives should be actioned-based and use the action verbs proposed in Bloom’s Taxonomy.  For example, this week in this course you have two objectives:
Develop specific and measurable objectives as a result of a needs assessment.
Create objectives based upon Blooms Taxonomy relevant to a training plan to satisfy a need within an organization.
Avoid generic words and phrases such as “learn,” “understand,” and “know.” Instead, focus on how you will measure and prove that your trainees have mastered the content.
Please make sure that you adhere to all APA standards: each submission should include a cover page, a reference page, and include appropriate in-text citations (if applicable when using information taken from other resources).

Resource:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4DgkLV9h69Q

Please make sure there are no italics and read instructions carefully. Last essay had things done that the professor said couldn’t be done with MLA format.

1. Paper 2 focuses on your interpretation of the meaning of one poem.  Choose one of the poems found in this unit on the page called “Reading Some Poems.”

2. The paper has a short introduction paragraph, which includes

a lead-in line to get the paper started [don’t start the first line of the paper with the thesis]; this is just a general statement of the topic of the paper,
the title of the poem [in quotation marks],
the name of the poet,
the thesis [your opinion about what the poem means or its major theme or idea].
3. The thesis makes one arguable point about the theme (point, meaning, your interpretation) of the poem. Your thesis is arguable; that is, it takes a stand that other people who read the poem might disagree with but one which you support. The thesis is your interpretation of a theme, point, or meaning of the poem.

4. The body of your paper contains several paragraphs. In the body paragraphs, you will want to

thoroughly explain all your ideas,
make every sentence clear and understandable to the reader
not use any contractions,
avoid using first (I, me, mine, our…) or second (you, your, you are…) person point of view in a formal college essay.
use the literary present tense of verbs to talk about your poem.  For example, the boy walks through the house, not “walked”; or the poem is about a young boy, not “was.”
5. Support your ideas in your body paragraphs with quotations from the poem.  Put quotation marks around the quotations.  After the quotation, put the line number in parenthesis.  Be sure to lead into the quotation before giving the quotation.  After the quotation tell what the quotation suggests to you or give your interpretation of the quotation.  Link this interpretation to the topic sentence of the paragraph and to the thesis of the paper to show how your interpretation of the quotation supports the topic sentence of the paragraph or the thesis of the paper. 

6. Since this is a paper about a poem, be sure to use the forward slash between lines of the poem that you quote.  When you quote, quote accurately.  Use ellipsis to indicate any omissions you have made from the original quotation.  Use square brackets to enclose any change you make in the original. If your quotation from the poem is long (more than 4 lines of the poem), display the quotation as a long quotation.

7.  End the paper with a short conclusion paragraph that echoes or mirrors the thesis in some way and that wraps up the entire paper. 

8. Type an outline page (with at least A’s and B’s under each Roman numeral), the paper itself, and a Work Cited page. 

9. Type the words “Paper 2” somewhere on the title page of your paper. 

10. Give your paper a title that is NOT the title of the poem. Type the title in the center, on the first page of your essay. 

11. Assigned length: 500-750 words.   

12. Underline the thesis in your introduction paragraph.

13. Submit your paper using the Assignments dropbox for this online course.  (More on that later)

1. Select a professional healthcare administrative position for which you believe you will be qualified upon graduation.

2. Research the position and describe, using publicly available data and information sources, the responsibilities of this job, scope of responsibility, typical remuneration and supervisory responsibilities if appropriate.  What does the person in the position do on a day to day basis?

3. Within what kind of organization is this position generally situated? How would one go about finding and securing such a position?

Note: If appropriate, identify someone in this or a similar position and talk to them about these questions. How would you utilize what you have studied in this course so far should you attain this job?  Be specific with the terms you used.

4. Utilize a minimum of three (3) sources to research your career topic.

5. Please include an introduction, body of the paper, and conclusion.

6. Format should be double-spaced with one-inch margins and a 12 point font.

7. Each student will research the topic assigned and submit a paper of at least 3 pages excluding cover, attachments and bibliography in APA format.

Note: In text citations should also be in APA format.

Imagine you are preparing to give a 10-minute lecture on George Herbert Mead and Erving Goffman. Prepare speaker notes of 750-1,000 words that you would use for this presentation. Include a basic summary of the theories proposed by each theorist, and a comparison of the similarities and differences between these two theorists. Make sure to include two to three peer-reviewed sources to support the information in your lecture.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Please write a 1-page (400-600 words) essay that demonstrates how you have overcome adversity and exemplified the following behaviors: Being clear, collaborative, and forthright; acting with integrity in all areas of your life; showing a drive for continuous learning and development; and continuously challenging your assumptions and exploring new alternatives.

Please choose a relatable topic

I need my paper to be revised. Here are the professor recommendation. I got 86 % for my draft please help. I attached the paper and when you open the document itself you will see the other issues the professor has pointed out. Thank you.

this is a really interesting and well-written paper. Following are my recommendations for improvement.

1.    Paragraphs are too long and several sections are missing references review.

2.    Review the 5th page of the topic outline to ensure your paper contains the correct sections. Recommend ensuring your paper contains the sections outlined there.

3.    I could not find your business framework (i.e. Cost Analysis, Value Chain, Lean, Six Sigma, Business Plan).

4.    The quadruple aim is intended to serve as a foundation for your project. Review the graphic for the paper on black board For your project – what healthcare problem do you want to improve? What quadruple aim segment does your project align with? Lastly, you are to identify a business framework to be used to implement your intervention.

5.    All in all your content is good need to make the changes above to ensure an excellent paper.

Review the Open, trusting relationships underpin safety in rural maternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study (PDF) (I WILL UPLOAD THE ARTICLE.) article from Crowther and Smythe.
Using this discussion’s qualitative critique rubric, discuss the article using Chapter 7 in the Galvan Literature Reviews text. To view this rubric, click the Settings drop-down list (Settings Icon) and select Show Rubric
Use APA format.
Create an academic, scholarly paper with an opening, body, and conclusion.

RUBRIC
Guidelines for Critique of Qualitative Research

Title

Abstract

Introduction: Statement of the Problem

Introduction: Literature Review

Introduction: Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Introduction: Research Questions

Method: Research Method and Design

Method: Sample Plan

Method: Data Collection

Method: Procedures

Method: Rigor of Instrument

Results: Data Analysis

Results: Findings

Results: Theoretical Integration

Discussion: Interpretation of the Findings

Discussion: Implications/Recommendations

Global Issues: Presentation
Opening paragraph Body of the paper (the critique, using the information above)

Global Issues: Summary Assessment

Global Issues: APA, Grammar, Spelling, Writing of the Critique
Use of APA style Proper grammar No misspellings Professional style without judgement or jargon Organized, concise writing

You need to complete an argument paper that proves your topic is a problem in North Carolina.  You are going to show the following in your paper:

A specific claim that promotes your position (side) on how your topic/issue is a problem in North Carolina – Remember, argument is based around the idea that people disagree and/or take various sides on an issue. You need to take a firm stand on how your topic is a problem in our state. Do not simply state a fact, like, “There are many homeless people in North Carolina.” This is not an argument. It is a fact that has been proven with research. However, you could argue, “The increasing homeless population in North Carolina is largely due to mental health issues that are not properly addressed because of state laws.”
Logical reasoning and evidence that prove your claim – You need to craft an organized and logical argument that proves your claim. You must present sound reasoning that is supported with scholarly, relevant and recent evidence. It is also important how your present this information, meaning the research you use should not take the place of your own writing. Remember, research is there to support YOUR reasoning, not take the place of it.
You understand opposing claims/points of view and can refute them – You need to show that you understand the varying points of view on your topic, and that you can analyze, paraphrase or summarize them. Also, you are able to refute these opposing claims using logic, reasoning and evidence (not simply stating that others are “wrong” in their opinion).
The use of a table, graph or infographic that adds emphasis to your argument – Select a relevant and recent table, graph or infographic from a source to incorporate into your argument. It should be tied to your reasoning and used as evidence to support your claim. Properly cite it using MLA citation. *Only use one and it can not be larger than the size of a normal paragraph. Carefully consider the sequence, structure and design of your argument when placing the infographic into your essay.
You understand your college-level audience and write to them in an objective, high style using clear, concise language – Even though this argument is based off your own opinion, you still need to write in a formal manner. Don’t use wording that “hedges” your argument, like, “I believe” and “I think.” Write in a confident tone. You are the authority of this argument. Do not rely on sources too much or have sources take over your essay. Your research should support your voice, not replace your voice as the authority in this argument. You want to continue to show that you have progressed in your writing through this semester. It should be clear, concise and virtually free of basic errors in grammar and mechanics.
You understand how to properly create a full citation and in-text citation using APA guidelines.
*To complete the assignment:

Write a four-page argument paper (not including your Works Cited page) that focuses on proving your topic is a problem in North Carolina
Use APA citation
Incorporate and properly cite a minimum of 5 sources – 2 of them MUST be new sources (not used in any of the previous writing assignments) and 2 MUST be from the library databases
Incorporate one table, graph or infographic from a cited source that is relevant to your argument

Watch the following video and apply your knowledge to the scenario below:

https://lawshelf.com:8443/videos/entry/fourth-amendment-exceptions-to-the-warrant-requirement-part-i
Scenario: A man was at his brother’s apartment when the police arrived. The police flashed a paper that they indicated was a warrant but was actually a court order for an unrelated case and asked to search the apartment. The man allowed the police to proceed with a search and drugs were discovered. The man’s brother (the tenant) was charged with possession of drugs. The defendant (the man’s brother/tenant) contends this search violated his Fourth Amendment rights and should not be admissible due to the Exclusionary Rule. Was the man’s consent valid? Or did he truly consent?

Watch the following video and apply your knowledge to the scenario below:

https://lawshelf.com:8443/videos/entry/fourth-amendment-warrant-requirement-exceptions-part-ii?TimeIndex=9
Scenario: Police received a report that three women in Halloween costumes had robbed a man in his house and stole money and jewelry from him. He lived on an island with only one ferry transporting people back and forth to the city and there was only one more transport that evening. Without getting a warrant, the police stopped all cars waiting on the ferry. In one car, three women were acting nervously when the police peered in their car. The police decided to search their car and found the victim’s stolen jewelry under the front seat. The women were immediately placed under arrest. Was the officers’ warrantless search valid or not? Explain your answer.

Examining Case Law: Miranda v. Arizona, 384, U.S. 436 (1966).
Almost everyone who has watched a crime drama on television can recall at least one pivotal moment, perhaps at the episodes climax, when a suspect is arrested and his rights are read to him. Many Americans can recite these legal warnings from memory, even though few have ever been arrested or interrogated by police officers. Officers have not always been required to inform individuals of their right to remain silent and other legal protections. This was mandated through a Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda v. Arizona, 384, U.S. 436 (1966), a decision that many in law enforcement said would prevent them from ever gaining another voluntary confession. Though controversial at the time, requiring officers to Mirandize (provide legal warnings to) an individual seems rather clich today.  Read more about the facts of this case at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=384&invol=436 . After reading about this landmark case (and reviewing the video on Miranda posted under “Readings and Lectures”, answer the following questions:

What is the constitutional issue being decided in this case (as delineated by Chief Justice Warren in section I)?
When is it necessary for officers to read an individual his or her rights?
What are the benefits and drawbacks associated with this decision?