Day: November 2, 2020

An inquiry-based research paper of 1500-2000 words. These are broad topics and you will need to find a narrow focus within them.  Your paper should have at least five (5) academic reference courses.  This should not include your textbook, Wikipedia, Brittania, Encarta, or any other online dictionaries or other very short non-academic Internet entries.  You have access to online academic journals through the University of Manitoba library system.  This is the best place for you to begin your search on your chosen topic. If you do not know how to conduct online research, please visit the library and ask for help from the reference librarian.
Formatting Guidelines:
1.  You must use a standard letter size page in portrait view (21.59cm x 27.94cm / 8 x 11).
2.  You must use either 1.5 or double spacing.
3.  You must use Times New Roman font, size 12. 
4.  You must use 3cm margins on all edges.
5.  You may indicate a paragraph change by either a line space or by indenting, BUT you must be consistent.
6.  Your paper is to be free of spelling and grammatical errors. You may use either English or American spelling, again you must be consistent. If you have had difficulty in writing papers, it is suggested that you make use of the resources offered by the University of Manitoba.
7.  Cite dates as follows:  1832-1836; 15 July 1836; the fifteenth-century; c. 1500; fifteenth-century houses.
8.  Place quotations within double inverted commas; quotations within quotations in single inverted commas.  Quotations more than 6 lines long should start on the next line and use a single-spaced block quote format.
9.  Italicize the titles of books, journals, works of art, buildings, and theses. Do not underline them.
10.  You are to use the Chicago Style for referencing the sources of your information.
11.  Your paper should have a cover page with your name, student number, and the title of your paper.
12.  Your paper is to be submitted in either .doc, .docx, or PDF format only

Grading Rubric for Written Papers:
Regarding the quality of the paper:
1. Does the paper have a clearly formulated thesis?
2. Is it written in formal, academic language appropriate to the subject?
3. Are the citations appropriate/overused or underused?
4. Is there evidence of original thought?
5. Is this a work of such high standard that even with some editing, it could be published in a professional journal?
Thus, papers will be graded to the following rubric:

A+ Excellent work; clear, flawless, engagingly written, well organized, logical, and demonstrating a clear command of the topic and showing original insights in the interpretation. The work exceeds all the minimum requirements of the assignment and shows a sophisticated thesis that is well supported by evidence. Demonstrates the ability to critically analyze and/or synthesize issues and problems. There is clear evidence of advanced research. There are virtually no problems with the writing style, grammar, or spelling. In other words, it is impeccable in every measure or expectation.

A Exhibits almost all of the characteristics of the A+ paper but with some minor flaws in the argument.

B+ The work is very good. It is well written and organized. It meets and often exceeds the minimum requirements of the assignment with frequent flashes of original thought. There is evidence of an advanced understanding of the material and evidence of attempts to critically analyze and/or synthesize issues and problems. There is clear evidence of advanced research. There are very few problems with the writing style, grammar, or spelling.

B Exhibits almost all of the characteristics of the B+ paper but has slight problems with the understanding of the issues and problems.

C+ The work is acceptable. It is generally clear and easy to read and meets and sometimes exceeds all of the minimum requirements of the assignment. There is evidence of a basic if the unambitious our underdeveloped understanding of the material with limited analysis. There is clear evidence of basic research and/or analytical skills but there are some problems with the writing style, grammar, or spelling that exceed those for the B+ to B range.

C The work is acceptable but has slight issues with clarity. It is not always easy to read but meets or sometimes exceeds the minimum requirements of the assignment. There is slightly less of an understanding of the material and there are attempts at analysis. There is clear evidence of basic research skills.

D The work is marginal. It meets only the minimum requirements of the assignment. There is evidence of only a simplistic understanding of the material. There is limited evidence of research and/or analytical skills. There are significant problems with the writing style, grammar, or spelling.

F The work is unsatisfactory. It does not meet the minimum requirements of the assignment and it fails to grasp even the most basic of concepts.

please choose the image from the PowerPoint Chapter 6.
all the rubric and instructions are in the attached materials.

First, you will choose an image from Chapter 6 it can be the one you took up previously or a new one. Then you are going to find two other images that share some similarities with the image you have chosen. These two images should come from other sources. A good place to look for these is the museum or gallery collection that houses your first work. You will use a thorough examination of these works as primary research for your essay. You may not use any textual sources not even the information provided by the website or collection you access for your other works. The only text you may use is the artists name, the name of the work, the date, the material or location, and the collection. Art history relies on images as the first and most important source of data and analysis, and this assignment will give you practice with that approach.
Essentially you will be doing a thorough comparison essay. Pick ONE element to focus on for your paper. Here are some possible options:
–    Subject matter or theme
–    Material
–    Artist
–    Location
–    Art movement
–    Composition
–    Style
–    Object type
Subject matter and artist are probably the most straightforward to address. For example, you might choose three works (one main one, two supporting) that are representations of a specific subject and then consider how each artist handles their subject in turn and why those similarities and differences are important. Conversely, you could be drawn to a particular artist, so you would choose three works by the same person and compare them to make comments about the artists development throughout their career and why those developments are important.  This is a useful trick ask yourself so what? and why does that matter? as youre developing your outline and writing your paper. In fact, I have that written on a sticky note on my desk. This will help you to push your analysis to its fullest conclusion and make your ideas more convincing…….so on
Please read the rubric attached material carefully!!