April 12, 2021 | Refined Essay

explain a social problem to a non-sociologist using a sociological perspective

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment Social Sciences, Undergraduate

Assignment 3: Final Project

Due: Sunday of Week 7 by 11:59 p.m. ET

Overview:

The purpose of the 12-15-page project is for you to be able to explain a social problem to a non-sociologist using a sociological perspective. It is to provide recommendations on how to address and resolve the problem.

Instructions:

Construct a 12-15 page paper that fully explores each of the following areas:

Introduction

Within at least four pages, clearly state your topic/social problem and how it is significant to the study of society. Includes social concepts and theories.

Background

Statement of the Problem

Why it is important to study

Purpose of the study

Research Questions (at least 3; what are you trying to discover or uncover?)

Research Methods

Within at least 2 pages, you will explain how you obtained relevant journal articles for your final project.

Literature Review

Within at least 3 pages, provide information on current publications about a particular topic (no more than 3 years old). You want to be sure and include at least 6 journal articles in this section. What are the experts saying about the topic? Includes social concepts and theories.

Discussion (findings), Recommendations, and Conclusion

Within at least six pages, discuss your major findings and interpret. First, restate the overall purpose of the study. Then explain the main finding as related to the overall purpose of the study. Include social concepts and theories. (3 pages)

In terms of your recommendations, you want to share practical steps that can be taken to implement the key findings of the research study. Ask yourself, how might you address your research questions? Remember, your recommendations must be supported by the findings from the data analysis (if applicable). Further, you want to include peer-reviewed sources to validate your recommendations. (2 pages)

Be sure and include a conclusion, which is a summary of the introduction. (1 page).

Sources

Includes at least 15 credible sources

Writing and APA Formatting

Follows writing expectations and submission is free of spelling and grammar errors. Correctly uses APA formatting

Grammar and Spelling (10%)

Submission is free of spelling and grammatical errors.

General requirements:

Submissions should be typed, double-spaced, 1″ margins, times new roman 12 pt font, and saved as .doc, .docx, .pdf.
Use APA format for citations and references
View the grading rubric so you understand how you will be assessed on this Assignment.
Disclaimer- Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
This course has “Resubmission” status enabled to help you if you realized you submitted an incorrect or blank file, or if you need to submit multiple documents as part of your Assignment. Resubmission of an Assignment after it is grades, to attempt a better grade, is not permitted.

Persuasive Essay

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment APA (edition "APA 6"), English and Literature

Write a 3 page paper about this topic and please make sure you answer if you think that body cams should be released or not. Also write about if you think that systematic discrimination has led to disparities.

Justice Studies
Video evidence gathered from police body camera and dash-cams should/should not be released to the public
Systemic discrimination has/has not led to disparities in the criminal justice system

Analysis of Findings

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment Social Sciences, Undergraduate

uctions
Analysis of Findings Related to Your Research Question and Hypothesis

Using the knowledge you gained from your Annotated Bibliography, evaluate your own research question and hypothesis. Requirements:

1. Introduction: Introduce your research project. Identify your research question, identify your hypothesis, and identify your main variables. Explain why you are researching this topic.

2. Literature Review: Present a Literature Review in which you briefly explain the existing knowledge in your particular research area. This means you should summarize your annotated bibliography in order to let your audience know the current state of research in your particular area of study. This includes a summary of the basic findings and conclusions of your authors. You should not go through everything for every study. It is not necessary to explain the methods, for example. Summarize the main findings.

3. Analysis: Offer your own analysis of your findings using at least 1 Theory or 1 Major Concept from either of our texts (Calavita or Deflem). Your analysis should describe the basic tenets of the theoretical framework or major concept you have chosen as well as a discussion of why this theoretical framework/theory best explains your findings related to your research question.

Evaluate the key research findings from your annotated bibliography. Do they support your hypothesis? Explain why or why not. What is the answer to your own Research Question?

4. Your paper must be in APA format with all sources cited. Your paper should be around 6 pages, double-spaced, 11 point font. Page count is for the body of the assignment, not including the title page or references.

Sample Outline:

Introduction
Research Question
Hypothesis
Identify Independent variables and Dependent variables
Why are you researching this topic?
Literature Review: Key findings of research from your annotated bibliography. It should be a summary of what you learned from your annotated bibliography. You should not copy and paste your annotated bibliography. I’m looking for more of a synthesis on the research findings that relate to your research question.
Analysis: Using at least 1 theory or 1 concept from our text, explain your results.
Answer your research question- was your hypothesis correct?
Conclusion- wrap it all up
General requirements:

**Please see attachment for research information and please create a hypothsis and etc.

Francois Furet

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment APA (edition "APA 6"), Philosophy

How can Francois Furet be analyzed through the historiography of the French Revolution? I am struggling to pin point him to a certain distinction of historiography because it seems like he combines approaches from differing meta-narratives. Is he more of a Marxist or a Social historian?

English Literature Essay

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment English and Literature, MLA

1. In A Domestic Dilemma by Carson McCullers, why must Martin confront his wifes drinking problem? Give three reasons. Put harmful effects of alcoholism on the family from (Two scholarly secondary sources are attached to quote from) . In the conclusion, give the THEME of the story. Use Template instructions in attachments. 5 paragraphs. Introudctory paragraph and 3 supporting paragraphs must have 1-2 Quotes *(from the story): and 1-2 quotes* (from secondary sources Which are both attached along with story) Conclusion paragraph must contain theme of story

Philosophy of love and sex

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment Philosophy, Undergraduate

1. Loving the Good, or Just Good Loving?
What is the relationship between the conception of love espoused by Socrates in the Symposium and Augustine’s conception of love? How might Socrates and Augustine best defend their conceptions of love in response to Baier’s criticisms of the misamorist tradition in “Unsafe Love’s”? Are any of the contemporary conceptions of love we have studied compatible with the Platonic and Augustinian conceptions of love? Why or why not?

6. He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not
What is Nozick’s account of love? How does his account differ from Firestone’s? Of the two accounts, which is the most philosophically defensible? Why? Firestone couples her account of love with a feminist interpretation of freudian psychology to argue that men cannot love. Suppose, however, that we substitute Firestone’s account of love with Nozick’s. With Nozick’s account instead of her own, could Firestone continue to argue that men are incapable of love in a patriarchy? Why or why not?

How to sustain and maintain an ethical command climate

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment Political science, Undergraduate

Explain the relationship between a Sergeants Majors role in establishing and sustaining a positive and ethical climate and the role of leadership in the exercise of moral courage (think about your responsibility to establish a positive ethical climate and how this impacts moral courage).

Reflect upon the below questions before you begin:

-How does a Sergeant Major help to sustain and maintain an ethical command climate in war? The response should discuss how the Sergeant Major would assess and develop the climate and ensure that the organizational conduct, policy, and norms are aligned with stated values.
-What is the Sergeant Majors role in fostering an environment where moral courage is displayed? -Your response should discuss the relationship between physical and moral courage and how power affects the demonstration of moral courage.

Assignment Instructions: Write a 400-word substantive entry responding to the prompts above. Use at least two references from the attached documents.

Epoch

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment APA (edition "APA 6"), History

Thomas is tired of hearing his grandparents talk about how things were when they were his age. He listens about how they were expected to work to contribute to the family and were happy to do so, how they were happy to have enough to eat and didn’t expect to eat out regularly, etc. Thomas explains to his grandparents that things are different now, so his feelings are different from theirs. What term would historians be most likely to use for how it feels to live in a particular time and place?

Adolescent smoking

April 12, 2021 Leave a comment Health Care and Life Sciences, Undergraduate

Week 2: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
Due Mar 14 by 11:59pm Points 125 Submitting a file upload
Purpose
The concepts of epidemiology provide the framework for the study of infectious and chronic health issues/diseases, which provides a rich source of data for the analysis of trends in disease and health. This assignment will offer the learner the opportunity to explore the population health effects of a topic which will be assigned by your course faculty.

As an example, you may be asked to identify populations at risk for oral health issues or, for instance, issues related to the frail living at home, and design a population health focused educational intervention for your target population.

In addition, you will look at what outcomes will be addressed to determine if your interventions are effective. This paper should integrate HP2020 and CDC information into your paper.

Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological sub-fields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics. (CO3)
Identify important sources of epidemiological data. (CO6)
Due Date: Sunday by 11:59pm MT of Week 2
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible: 125 Points
Requirements

Research Topic: Your course faculty will provide you with topic/s for this assignment. Please check the NR503 Course Announcements.

Identify your target population (for instance, age or other demographic, aggregate population); this must be in your city or state.
Discuss population-based health education interventions for your target population that is aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality for the problem. Be sure to review the research literature and HP2020 for interventions.
Identify how and what data for interventions is being tracked.
In a four (4) page paper, address the following. Refer to rubric for expanded details related to grading expectations.
Identify the problem in the introduction section.
Provide an overview of the problem in your state/national.
Review of descriptive epidemiological and demographic data on mortality/morbidity and risk.
HP2020: Present the goal, overview and objectives of Healthy People 2020 for the paper topic.
Population level prevention and health promotion review. Describe population and/or primary health care focused interventions. Use of scholarly literature and HP2020 is required. There should be direct correlation to evidence for all strategies.

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

Review directions and rubric through carefully.
Follow submission requirements.
Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included. Organize the paper using the rubric sections and appropriate headings to match the sections.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
A minimum of three (3) scholarly literature references must be used. Not all references should be from scholarly web sites. You may use your textbook, but this will not count towards the three (3) scholarly literature references.
Length: Papers not adhering to the page length may be returned to you for editing to meet the length guidelines.
Adhere to the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic policy on integrity as it pertains to the submission of your own original work for assignments.

Rubric
NR503_HP2020_Sept19
NR503_HP2020_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Content Possible Points = 100 Points
Introduction of the Problem (no heading)

1. Problem is clearly stated.

2. General introduction to the problem supports its importance as a population health issue with data and general statement of scope of problem.

3. Focus of the paper is stated succinctly.

(3 critical elements)
5 pts
Excellent
All bullet items (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation, by evidence.
4 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
3 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
2 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Problem is unsupported 4. Writing is largely unsupported
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion: Overview, Background and Significance of the Problem
1. Provide background and significance of the problem.

2. This includes risks and impact of disease.

3. Data: State and National: Incidence, prevalence, mortality, breakdown by gender/race/religion as appropriately related

(3 critical elements)
25 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence.
23 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
21 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
12 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEpidemiological Analysis of the Problem
1. Using descriptive epidemiology (provide description of term) analyze health problem

2. Include demographic and related epidemiological data

3. Include characteristics of at-risk population using HP2020 specified criteria

(3 critical elements)
30 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
27 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
25 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
15 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of HP 2020
1. Identify HP2020 goals and objectives

2. Relate HP2020 goals and objectives to health concern topic

3. Identify guidelines and a screening method related to health concern

4. Review validity (predictive power) of screening tool method to include what population the tool is applicable to use with (for instance, adult, child, culture)

(4 critical elements)
20 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
18 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
17 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation Level Planning Interventions
1. Investigate what is being done at the population health level related to prevention and health promotion for the health problem at the national and state level

2. Identify what and how outcomes are being tracked related to said interventions.

3. Utilize HP2020, CDC, state public health department, research, etc. as resources for interventions and data.

(3 critical elements)
20 pts
Excellent
All critical elements (content) included with depth and consistent connection, validation by evidence
18 pts
V. Good
All content included but limited clarity or depth OR Content is missing one critical element.
17 pts
Satisfactory
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements Or 2. Writing lacks clarity, depth
10 pts
Needs Improvement
Content missing: 1. Two critical elements 2. Clarity 3. Writing is largely unsupported
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Section missing
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Format Possible Points = 25 Points
APA

1. All content accurately utilizes APA format for citations and table formatting per APA current edition.

2. Reference list is formatted per APA current edition.

Cover page, running heads, font size and type, reference list and headings per APA current ed.
15 pts
Excellent
No APA errors
14 pts
V. Good
1-2 APA errors
12 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 APA errors
8 pts
Needs Improvement
5-6 APA errors
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more APA errors
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, Spelling
1. Grammar, writing voice, and spelling are in accordance with APA 6th edition.

2. Scientific prose/voice is consistent.

3. Writing has precision and clarity

4. See APA 6th edition, 3, Writing Clearly and Concisely
10 pts
Excellent
Written work is free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
9 pts
V. Good
Written work is largely free of grammatical, spelling or syntax errors. (Approximately 1-2).
8 pts
Satisfactory
Written work includes some grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader.(Approximately 3-4).
5 pts
Needs Improvement
Written work contains numerous grammatical, spelling or syntax errors that distract the reader (Approximately 5-6).
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 or more errors
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
Deduc