Respond to the following student responses provided based on the following Prompt 1  (Each Response should be 137 words)

Do you agree with Marx that the process of alienation occurs among workers?  Has digital technology exacerbated the process of alienation among some workers?  Think of specific examples.  Do you agree that individuals a species being?  What type of economic system would allow humans to best realize their species-being?
Student Response 1:
I do not feel this is a yes or no answer, it depends more on the context of how someone perceives it.  Regarding alienation of the worker from their product I do not feel that is entirely accurate, if so, no new products would ever be produced.  Man, daily strives to create new objects that are bigger and better products, or smaller and sleeker.  Case in point, the camcorder, when I was growing up most camcorders were the size of a briefcase held on someones shoulder, today for $1000, you anyone can own a camcorder small enough to fit in your hand.  Music is the same way, I have Bluetooth ear buds that I pop in when I go to the gym, (telling my age here) but I had a Walkman when I was younger with a wired cord for both a cassette player and for a simple radio.  So, in that aspect no I do not agree that Marx was correct, situationally maybe but not completely.  As for alienation of the worker from other workers yes, I believe that is correct.  I believe everyone has experienced this, working harder, being more productive than the next person to stand out for recognition and reward so not to blend in with the crowd.  This is a dual edge sword, when management views you as expendable they have a tendency of treating you as such, when you stand out and separate yourself from the pack not only do you receive recognition for your determination, but also soak up the spotlight when punitive actions are being handed down also.  Each economic system is slightly flawed, but I would suggest either Traditional or Market.  Traditional would be beneficial because it would require people to become self-sufficient and stop looking for handouts, geologically this would not be sufficient as obtaining foreign goods would take forever to get.  A market economy provides services and goods through supply and demand, self-explanatory.  Consequently, where both falls short is, there are many people in every country that rely heavily on command economics.  Welfare and unemployment are examples of this where people are heavily dependent on the government for their daily life.  Devils advocate side of this is, there are many people, who without a heavily structured and guiding invisible hand, would fall into anarchy.  So I honestly believe parts of all three are needed, or at bare minimum a hybrid that incorporates certain measures from all three and disregards the negatives, I dont think we will see an economic structure like that in this lifetime. 

Student Response 2
I can agree with Marx that the employee can become a commodity and can be the worst kind of commodities. Employees are seen as replaceable. Employees are not seen as a valuable commodity. Ive heard a saying that if you leave there are five more to replace you. This is detrimental to the employees mental health and loyalty to a business since they are so eagerly ready to replace them. With an employee unhappy to be working then the employee can distant themselves and feel alienated from the work. The employee is then disgruntled and can ruin the mind by constantly being so unhappy all the time. Technology has alienated human more than just in the workplace especially since the nation being under quarantine during the corona outbreak. We rely on technology for everything now. There is no human interaction. We can order food, groceries, clothing, and everything in between to have it delivered to our homes and never actually connect or have a conversation with another human being. I can agree that individuals can possess their species-being. If a person has located their passion in life and make a living doing that passion then the person has found their species-being. 

Assignment: Post-Disaster Recovery
what you learned about the complexity of working with clients in post-disaster recovery situations and some of the issues that they may experience as they move through the recovery process.  Consider the role of government agencies, environmental engineers, and non-government agencies in the resources and help that they may provide.  Use at least three professional or official agency sources to support your work. 

What are some of the strategies and considerations used when working with families as compared to individuals?  Consider health disparities, advocacy and collaboration with other health care workers.  Use at least three professional references in addition to your textbook,

this is the text book
Rector, C. (2018). Community and public health nursing: Promoting the public’s health (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

2.    Your first task will be to read the articles thoroughly, using active Reading Strategies and annotation methods.
3.    You will then prepare a brief SUMMARY & RESPONSE Paper:  This will be an INFORMAL writing assignment rather than a researched argument.  However, I still want you to adhere to a specific set of document design strategies for these papers.
4.    These papers must be double-spaced and in compliance with the document design guidelines handout.  They are to be a minimum of 500 words long.  The Title should read Summary Response One (and so on).  The word count should be TYPED in parentheses at the end of the paper.
5.    You should correctly identify the title and author(s) of the article in the first one or two sentences of your paper.
6.    The papers should consist of TWO PARAGRAPHS:
a.    The first paragraph should be a summary of the key ideas in the articles, which adheres to the summary guidelines (see Summary handout):
1)    Purpose: give a reader a short, but clear account of the readings main points. Audience: someone who hasnt read the text.
2)    A summary is completely in your wordsdont use the writers words. Explain the writers ideas but put them in your words.
3)    A summary contains none of your opinions about the source. It is only a re-telling of the article in your own words.
b.    The second paragraph should be your personal response to the article, an expression of your opinion about the ideas, controversies, and problems/solutions explored in the article.  This paragraph can take any form that you are comfortable with but must express some opinion relevant to the subject matter, including a personal connection or story.

-The topic is one your own choice.  Choose a topic that is relevant, intellectually stimulating, and memorable for your audience.

-You must cite at least one credible, reputable, and/or scholarly source.  Be sure and conduct your research to add credibility to both yourself and your speech

The nine documents are in the file named “The Question”.

Please read the documents named with numbers in the additional materials. They are the class notes.

Please utilize the class notes while writing the essay.

Please carefully read “Document commentary method” and write the essay according to the guidelines (please strictly follow).

Please write with good English, avoid repeating the same content with different words just to fill the word-count.

Please respond to messages (I won’t send a lot, just at the beginning.)

Please make sure the work is plagirism free.

There are two versions of 7 because I think it is the most useful.

While bureaucrats have an awful lot of power, they do have some accountability to the public.  For example, most of the rules bureaucrats propose must be open for public comment.  These proposed rules are posted on The Federal Register, and are there for anyone to review and comment on, typically for 60 days.

Your task is to go to The Federal Register and review a proposed rule under the Current Issue section.  To receive credit, you’ll need to:

Summarize the rule– who proposed it, and what will it change? (0-3 points)

Analyze the rule– give at least one reason why the new rule would be good, and one reason why it would be bad (0-3 points)

Evaluate the rule– Should the rule be passed?  Why, or why not? (0-4 points)

Be sure your essay is at least 250 words long, and includes a link to the proposed rule.  No credit will be awarded if you fail to do this.  Also– keep in mind that, while this is a shorter essay, you are still expected to use multiple paragraphs in your essay.  No credit will be awarded if your essay is only one paragraph long.