Submit a brief response to the reading and narrated PPT from this week, Art and the Body: The Body as a Sign (2 parts) that responds to the following:

    What do you understand to be a key point or issue raised in the narrated PPT from this week?
    Write one question that you had about the ideas or content presented in the PPT from this week
only need 1/2 3/4 page, double spaced
here is the link to the video show in the ppt :
https://youtu.be/eycL8JMaxRw
https://youtu.be/AbUkraQIYv8
https://youtu.be/h50IzHh4T_g
https://youtu.be/tiszC33puc0
https://youtu.be/drZIWs3Dl1k
https://youtu.be/z23wA-0vPmY
https://youtu.be/HuKw8inY4lM
https://youtu.be/G6KQTDlvhPI

Many ethicists contend that Jewish philosopher Martin Bubers contrast of Iit relationships and Ithou relationships is particularly relevant to the ecological and economic justice crises as well as the ideal for healthy interpersonal relationships.
After reading this week’s resources on Buber, do you agree or disagree with those assertions?  Why or why not making specific references to this and other material.

https://www.brainpickings.org/2018/03/18/i-and-thou-martin-buber/

    Write a paragraph that provides a detailed comparison at least two nursing specialties, including your selected specialization and second-preferred specialization. —my first choice is psychiatrist nursing and cardiac telemetry

    Write a clear and accurate 2- to 3-paragraph justification statement identifying your reasons for choosing your psych MSN specialization.

At least 3 references

1. Complete this Management Live assignment:
        a. Review the Management Live 10.4 feature in Chapter 10 in Baldwin et al. (2013). (ATTACHED)
        b. Explain why you do or do not believe that it can be functional for teams to fight.
        c. Describe a time when you were on a team that had a fight. Identify whether or not the fight was functional and explain how you could have used the tactics described in the Management Live 10.4 feature to help the team to fight more productively.

2. Complete this Team Cohesion assignment:
        a. Review the Building Team Cohesion section (ATTACHED) and the Managers Tool Kit 10.4 feature in Chapter 10 in Baldwin et al. (2013). (ATTACHED)
        b. Describe a time when you have been a part of a very cohesive team in the healthcare environment (e.g., on a project team working on a healthcare assignment for school, or on a team at work).
        c. Explain whether or not your team practiced the steps described in the Managers Tool Kit 10.4 feature.
        d. Explain how you know if you are part of a cohesive team and what happens within the team that makes it cohesive.
        e. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of having a cohesive team.

3. Complete this Case Study assignment:
        a. Review the Small Teams, No Titles: Life at W.L. Gore case study at the end of Chapter 10 in Baldwin et al. (2013).
        b. Answer the questions at the end of the case study.

Read Case I, pages 423-425: “Last Mile Corporation: Choosing a Development Partner”. (Case 1 is attached in the files and uploaded)
Prepare a report (i.e., essay) to address the following issues:
First, summarize the case in ONE paragraph
Then, answer the following questions:

What are the other alternatives that LastMile could look at that would create a working relationship between Midwest Technologies and LastMile?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives?

What are the objectives that LastMile would like to accomplish out of such a partnership?

What counter proposal(s) would you recommend?

1 consists of answering Critical Thinking Questions from CRIM 210 (Introduction to Criminology). Please answer the assigned questions in 3-6 paragraphs (4-6 sentences per paragraph) using proper A.P.A. writing techniques. Each writing assignment is scored out of 50 points. Outside . Please use Times New Roman 12 font and double space the document. The writing assignment will be graded on content, proper writing/grammar, A.P.A. format, and research. The professor will check for plagiarism, so please be conscious of plagiarism rules. Please be detailed and remember to support all claims within the document. Please refer to the Writing sample template and instructions for further information. Upload the assignment in a Microsoft Word document on Blackboard prior to the deadline.

Below is the grade rubric for each writing assignment along with a sample template:

Content (15 points): Did the student answer the questions in the proper context and provide sufficient evidence explaining their position? Additional scholarly resources supporting opinions expressed will be needed in order to maximize points. Remember each question should be 3-6 paragraphs (4-6 sentences per paragraph) in length.

Grammar/Proper Writing (15 points): Did the student follow proper grammar and writing techniques? The writing assignment involves technical writing. Avoid pronoun-antecedent agreement errors, avoid broad generalizations and journalistic rhetoric, and use formal language. Attempt to eliminate all typographical or spelling errors from the document.

A.P.A. Format (10 points): Did the student follow proper A.P.A. writing techniques including proper citations (in-text and reference)? Remember to include a proper A.P.A. cover page (see sample found in the syllabus) and a reference. When paraphrasing please use the author’s last name comma year. For example, (Smith, 2020) or Smith & Jackson, 2020) for multiple authors. If you are using a direct quote, add the page number for instance, “The class involved studying criminology” (Anderson, 2020, p.130). All students should follow the template provided and consult an A.P.A. handbook for additional information regarding A.P.A. format.

Research (10 points): Did the student support claims and arguments with solid facts from outside scholarly resources along with the textbook? Remember to limit the number of direct quotes and paraphrase outside resources in order to improve the quality of the document. Each writing assignment should have at least 3-6 scholarly or peer-reviewed references. Some helpful hints include citing scholarly material found in academic databases such as, ProQuest, JSTOR, or EBSCO. Try to avoid non-scholarly research such as, magazines, unsupported websites, newspaper articles, Wikipedia, YouTube or television articles etc. Research is essential when supporting an opinion within the document.

These are the questions that you have to answer and write about;

Q1 in your opinion, do you believe shaming in a form of deterrence, and can shaming be used as an effective form of punishment? why or why not?

Q2 can American society provide justice to victims while limiting incarceration? why or why not?

Q3 According to rational choice theorists, why do some people under certain circumstances com-it crime or delinquency?

I have  upload a sample written  paper to give an idea of what is required

1.    Describe the H&T company & its sustainability e.g., sector of tourism, size of company, location/s, ownership (local or foreign), years in operation, significance of the companys efforts (e.g., certifications, funds, projects, policies, etc.) to sustainability, examples and types of sustainability (e.g., social, ecological, economic).
2.    Assess applicable UNSDGs e.g., comprehensive discussion of applicable SDGs with specific examples demonstrated by your chosen H&T company, primary & secondary stakeholders (e.g., tourists, local people, businesses in the supply chain, local government, habitat & wildlife, etc.) in short, which of the 17 SDGs, where and how to integrate them.
3.    Advocate the incorporation of UNSDGs e.g., the ripple effect of the chosen SDGs, scale of your proposed ideas (local/regional/global), applicable sector/s of tourism, proposed partners to work on ideas, participation of stakeholders (as outlined in #2) in short, why would your H&T company want to integrate these SDGs.

Instructions

For this assessment, put together all of the pieces you have been working on throughout the course to form your research project. The Research Report Template will help you include the following in your project.

Insert the following from previous assessments into the template.

Introduction
Insert your literature review after your title. If you have not done so previously, revise your literature review based on any instructor feedback.
Methods
Participants
Describe the number of participants in the study, meaning, and the number of participants who responded to both variables selected.
Be sure to revise based on any instructor feedback you received.
Measures
Insert the measurement you chose from your research proposal.
Be sure to revise based on any instructor feedback you received.
Be sure to turn the future tense from the proposal to past tense for this assessment.
Procedure
Insert your explanation of your procedure from your research proposal.
Be sure to revise based on any instructor feedback you received.
Be sure to turn the future tense from the proposal to past tense for this assessment.
Results
Insert your statistical analysis from your data analysis assessment.
Be sure to revise based on any instructor feedback you received.
For this assessment, you will write the Discussion section and Summary and Conclusion section of the template. In the Discussion section, answer the following questions:

What do your results mean?
How do your results compare to what you expected?
How do your results compare to other research studies?
How can your results be generalized?
What were the limitations of the study?
Think about research validity and reliability.
How do your results support or not support a psychological theory or concept?

Overview
In this age of acute competition and alignment of providers, systems are evolving to improve contracting opportunities, including population health, Accountable Care organizations, and models of health care delivery. They are targeting quality care at a value price. This assignment explores a provider of your choice to determine their desirability to be a member of a system and recommend improvements they may need to make to become more competitive in their market.

Requirements
Write a 23 page proposal in which you evaluate and make recommendations for a provider you have chosen in terms of safety, quality, and evidence-informed health care by doing the following:

Choose a health care providernursing home, hospital, home care, etc.
Using the search function on Medicare.gov to review your provider’s measures on safety, quality, and evidence-informed health care.
Pay attention to the publicly reported outcomes on mortality, rehospitalization, and infection rates, as well as patient satisfaction and preventive care.
Note: If you have chosen a home health provider, use the Home Health Quality Measures website to review their home health quality measures.
Identify other providers in the same geographic area, review their outcomes, and compare your provider (e.g., search by Zip code).
Determine how these outcomes impact this provider as a potential member for a health system, Accountable Care organization, or as a contender to obtain population health contracts.
Based on the reports, determine which quality initiative the providers should address through evidence-based practices, such as safety, quality, rehospitalizations, mortality, etc.
Would your provider be the desired member of a system?
What is your recommendation for this provider to improve their outcomes in order to improve reimbursement and to become a desirable member of a system of providers?